Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of Inhaled Epoprostenol and Inhaled Nitric Oxide for Refractory Hypoxemia in Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019.
DeGrado, Jeremy R; Szumita, Paul M; Schuler, Brian R; Dube, Kevin M; Lenox, Jesslyn; Kim, Edy Y; Weinhouse, Gerald L; Massaro, Anthony F.
  • DeGrado JR; Department of Pharmacy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA.
  • Szumita PM; Department of Pharmacy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA.
  • Schuler BR; Department of Pharmacy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA.
  • Dube KM; Department of Pharmacy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA.
  • Lenox J; Department of Respiratory Therapy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA.
  • Kim EY; Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA.
  • Weinhouse GL; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
  • Massaro AF; Department of Respiratory Therapy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA.
Crit Care Explor ; 2(10): e0259, 2020 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-900571
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

The objectives of this study were to evaluate the efficacy and safety of inhaled epoprostenol and inhaled nitric oxide in patients with refractory hypoxemia secondary to coronavirus disease 2019.

DESIGN:

Retrospective single-center study.

SETTING:

ICUs at a large academic medical center in the United States. PATIENTS Thirty-eight adult critically ill patients with coronavirus disease 2019 and refractory hypoxemia treated with either inhaled epoprostenol or inhaled nitric oxide for at least 1 hour between March 1, 2020, and June 30, 2020.

INTERVENTIONS:

Electronic chart review. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

RESULTS:

Of 93 patients screened, 38 were included in the analysis, with mild (4, 10.5%), moderate (24, 63.2%), or severe (10, 26.3%), with acute respiratory distress syndrome. All patients were initiated on inhaled epoprostenol as the initial pulmonary vasodilator and the median time from intubation to initiation was 137 hours (68-228 h). The median change in Pao2/Fio2 was 0 (-12.8 to 31.6) immediately following administration of inhaled epoprostenol. Sixteen patients were classified as responders (increase Pao2/Fio2 > 10%) to inhaled epoprostenol, with a median increase in Pao2/Fio2 of 34.1 (24.3-53.9). The mean change in Pao2 and Spo2 was -0.55 ± 41.8 and -0.6 ± 4.7, respectively. Eleven patients transitioned to inhaled nitric oxide with a median change of 11 (3.6-24.8) in Pao2/Fio2. A logistic regression analysis did not identify any differences in outcomes or characteristics between the responders and the nonresponders. Minimal adverse events were seen in patients who received either inhaled epoprostenol or inhaled nitric oxide.

CONCLUSIONS:

We found that the initiation of inhaled epoprostenol and inhaled nitric oxide in patients with refractory hypoxemia secondary to coronavirus disease 2019, on average, did not produce significant increases in oxygenation metrics. However, a group of patients had significant improvement with inhaled epoprostenol and inhaled nitric oxide. Administration of inhaled epoprostenol or inhaled nitric oxide may be considered in patients with severe respiratory failure secondary to coronavirus disease 2019.
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study Language: English Journal: Crit Care Explor Year: 2020 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Cce.0000000000000259

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study Language: English Journal: Crit Care Explor Year: 2020 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Cce.0000000000000259