Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Serological determinants of COVID-19.
Noce, Annalisa; Santoro, Maria Luisa; Marrone, Giulia; D'Agostini, Cartesio; Amelio, Ivano; Duggento, Andrea; Tesauro, Manfredi; Di Daniele, Nicola.
  • Noce A; UOC of Internal Medicine-Center of Hypertension and Nephrology Unit, Department of Systems Medicine, University of Rome Tor Vergata, via Montpellier 1, 00133, Rome, Italy. annalisa.noce@uniroma2.it.
  • Santoro ML; Laboratory Pathologist Director of Artemisia Lab - Alessandria, Via Piave, 76 00187, Rome, Italy.
  • Marrone G; UOC of Internal Medicine-Center of Hypertension and Nephrology Unit, Department of Systems Medicine, University of Rome Tor Vergata, via Montpellier 1, 00133, Rome, Italy.
  • D'Agostini C; PhD School of Applied Medical, Surgical Sciences, University of Rome Tor Vergata, via Montpellier 1, 00133, Rome, Italy.
  • Amelio I; Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Rome Tor Vergata, via Montpellier 1, 00133, Rome, Italy.
  • Duggento A; Laboratory of Clinical Microbiology, Policlinico Tor Vergata, viale Oxford 81, 00133, Rome, Italy.
  • Tesauro M; Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Rome Tor Vergata, via Montpellier 1, 00133, Rome, Italy.
  • Di Daniele N; School of Life Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Biol Direct ; 15(1): 21, 2020 11 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-901910
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection spreaded rapidly worldwide, as far as it has become a global pandemic. Therefore, the introduction of serological tests for determination of IgM and IgG antibodies has become the main diagnostic tool, useful for tracking the spread of the virus and for consequently allowing its containment. In our study we compared point of care test (POCT) lateral flow immunoassay (FIA) vs automated chemiluminescent immunoassay (CLIA), in order to assess their specificity and sensibility for COVID-19 antibodies detection.

RESULTS:

We find that different specificities and sensitivities for IgM and IgG tests. Notably IgM POCT FIA method vs CLIA method (gold standard) has a low sensitivity (0.526), while IgG POCT FIA method vs CLIA method (gold standard) test has a much higher sensitivity (0.937); further, with respect of IgG, FIA and CLIA could arguably provide equivalent information.

CONCLUSIONS:

FIA method could be helpful in assessing in short time, the possible contagiousness of subjects that for work reasons cannot guarantee "social distancing".
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pneumonia, Viral / Serologic Tests / Coronavirus Infections Type of study: Diagnostic study Limits: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: English Journal: Biol Direct Year: 2020 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: S13062-020-00276-1

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pneumonia, Viral / Serologic Tests / Coronavirus Infections Type of study: Diagnostic study Limits: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: English Journal: Biol Direct Year: 2020 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: S13062-020-00276-1