Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Readability of online COVID-19 health information: a comparison between four English speaking countries.
Worrall, Amy P; Connolly, Mary J; O'Neill, Aine; O'Doherty, Murray; Thornton, Kenneth P; McNally, Cora; McConkey, Samuel J; de Barra, Eoghan.
  • Worrall AP; Department of Infectious Diseases, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, 9, Ireland. worralap@tcd.ie.
  • Connolly MJ; Royal College of Surgeons Ireland, Dublin, Ireland. worralap@tcd.ie.
  • O'Neill A; Royal College of Surgeons Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.
  • O'Doherty M; Department of Surgery, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
  • Thornton KP; Department of Infectious Diseases, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, 9, Ireland.
  • McNally C; Royal College of Surgeons Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.
  • McConkey SJ; Department of Infectious Diseases, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, 9, Ireland.
  • de Barra E; Royal College of Surgeons Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.
BMC Public Health ; 20(1): 1635, 2020 Nov 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-919052
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The internet is now the first line source of health information for many people worldwide. In the current Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) global pandemic, health information is being produced, revised, updated and disseminated at an increasingly rapid rate. The general public are faced with a plethora of misinformation regarding COVID-19 and the readability of online information has an impact on their understanding of the disease. The accessibility of online healthcare information relating to COVID-19 is unknown. We sought to evaluate the readability of online information relating to COVID-19 in four English speaking regions Ireland, the United Kingdom, Canada and the United States, and compare readability of website source provenance and regional origin.

METHODS:

The Google® search engine was used to collate the first 20 webpage URLs for three individual searches for 'COVID', 'COVID-19', and 'coronavirus' from Ireland, the United Kingdom, Canada and the United States. The Gunning Fog Index (GFI), Flesch-Kincaid Grade (FKG) Score, Flesch Reading Ease Score (FRES), Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG) score were calculated to assess the readability.

RESULTS:

There were poor levels of readability webpages reviewed, with only 17.2% of webpages at a universally readable level. There was a significant difference in readability between the different webpages based on their information source (p < 0.01). Public Health organisations and Government organisations provided the most readable COVID-19 material, while digital media sources were significantly less readable. There were no significant differences in readability between regions.

CONCLUSION:

Much of the general public have relied on online information during the pandemic. Information on COVID-19 should be made more readable, and those writing webpages and information tools should ensure universal accessibility is considered in their production. Governments and healthcare practitioners should have an awareness of the online sources of information available, and ensure that readability of our own productions is at a universally readable level which will increase understanding and adherence to health guidelines.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pneumonia, Viral / Coronavirus Infections / Internet / Comprehension / Consumer Health Information / Pandemics Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: North America / Europa Language: English Journal: BMC Public Health Journal subject: Public Health Year: 2020 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: S12889-020-09710-5

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pneumonia, Viral / Coronavirus Infections / Internet / Comprehension / Consumer Health Information / Pandemics Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: North America / Europa Language: English Journal: BMC Public Health Journal subject: Public Health Year: 2020 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: S12889-020-09710-5