Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Use of Receiver Operating Curve Analysis and Machine Learning With an Independent Dose Calculation System Reduces the Number of Physical Dose Measurements Required for Patient-Specific Quality Assurance.
Hasse, K; Scholey, J; Ziemer, B P; Natsuaki, Y; Morin, O; Solberg, T D; Hirata, E; Valdes, G; Witztum, A.
  • Hasse K; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, California. Electronic address: Katelyn.hasse@ucsf.edu.
  • Scholey J; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, California.
  • Ziemer BP; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, California.
  • Natsuaki Y; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, California.
  • Morin O; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, California.
  • Solberg TD; FDA, Washington, District of Columbia.
  • Hirata E; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, California.
  • Valdes G; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, California.
  • Witztum A; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, California.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys ; 109(4): 1086-1095, 2021 03 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-921999
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

Our purpose was to assess the use of machine learning methods and Mobius 3D (M3D) dose calculation software to reduce the number of physical ion chamber (IC) dose measurements required for patient-specific quality assurance during corona virus disease 2019. METHODS AND MATERIALS In this study, 1464 inversely planned treatments using Pinnacle or Raystation treatment planning software (TPS) were delivered using Elekta Versa HD and Varian Truebeam and Truebeam STx linear accelerators between June 2018 and November 2019. For each plan, an independent dose calculation was performed using M3D, and an absolute dose measurement was taken using a Pinpoint IC inside the Mobius phantom. The point dose differences between the TPS and M3D calculation and between TPS and IC measurements were calculated. Agreement between the TPS and IC was used to define the ground truth plan failure. To reduce the on-site personnel during the pandemic, 2 methods of receiver operating characteristic analysis (n = 1464) and machine learning (n = 603) were used to identify patient plans that would require physical dose measurements.

RESULTS:

In the receiver operating characteristic analysis, a predelivery M3D difference threshold of 3% identified plans that failed an IC measurement at a 4% threshold with 100% sensitivity and 76.3% specificity. This indicates that fewer than 25% of plans required a physical dose measurement. A threshold of 1% on a machine learning model was able to identify plans that failed an IC measurement at a 3% threshold with 100% sensitivity and 54.3% specificity, leading to fewer than 50% of plans that required a physical dose measurement.

CONCLUSIONS:

It is possible to identify plans that are more likely to fail IC patient-specific quality assurance measurements before delivery. This possibly allows for a reduction of physical measurements taken, freeing up significant clinical resources and reducing the required amount of on-site personnel while maintaining patient safety.
Subject(s)

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Radiotherapy Dosage / Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted / ROC Curve / Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated / Machine Learning Type of study: Prognostic study Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Year: 2021 Document Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Radiotherapy Dosage / Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted / ROC Curve / Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated / Machine Learning Type of study: Prognostic study Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Year: 2021 Document Type: Article