Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Remote monitoring of cardiac implantable devices during COVID-19 outbreak: "keep people safe" and "focus only on health care needs".
Iacopino, Saverio; Placentino, Filippo; Colella, Jacopo; Pesce, Francesca; Pardeo, Antonino; Filannino, Pasquale; Artale, Paolo; Desiro, Dalila; Sorrenti, Paolo; Campagna, Giuseppe; Fabiano, Gennaro; Peluso, Gianluca; Giacopelli, Daniele; Petretta, Andrea.
  • Iacopino S; Arrhythnology Department, Maria Cecilia Hospital, Cotignola, Italy.
  • Placentino F; Arrhythnology Department, Maria Cecilia Hospital, Cotignola, Italy.
  • Colella J; Arrhythnology Department, Maria Cecilia Hospital, Cotignola, Italy.
  • Pesce F; Arrhythnology Department, Maria Cecilia Hospital, Cotignola, Italy.
  • Pardeo A; Arrhythnology Department, Maria Cecilia Hospital, Cotignola, Italy.
  • Filannino P; Arrhythnology Department, Maria Cecilia Hospital, Cotignola, Italy.
  • Artale P; Arrhythnology Department, Maria Cecilia Hospital, Cotignola, Italy.
  • Desiro D; Arrhythnology Department, Maria Cecilia Hospital, Cotignola, Italy.
  • Sorrenti P; Arrhythnology Department, Maria Cecilia Hospital, Cotignola, Italy.
  • Campagna G; Arrhythnology Department, Maria Cecilia Hospital, Cotignola, Italy.
  • Fabiano G; Arrhythnology Department, Maria Cecilia Hospital, Cotignola, Italy.
  • Peluso G; Arrhythnology Department, Maria Cecilia Hospital, Cotignola, Italy.
  • Giacopelli D; Clinical Research, BIOTRONIK Italia S.p.a, Vimodrone, Italy.
  • Petretta A; Arrhythnology Department, Maria Cecilia Hospital, Cotignola, Italy.
Acta Cardiol ; 76(2): 158-161, 2021 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-933775
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The COVID-19 pandemic has challenged the ability of health care organisations to provide adequate care. We report the experience of a national tertiary electrophysiology centre in the management of patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) through the use of a fully remote follow-up model.

METHODS:

We daily and prospectively collected remote monitoring (RM) relevant findings and following clinical actions performed from March 10th to April 3rd 2020, a period of suspension of routine ambulatory activity due to the national lockdown.

RESULTS:

During the study period (25 days), we received 2,215 transmissions from 2,955 devices. Among them, 129 patients reported potential clinically actionable RM observations (event rate 12.0/1000 patient-week). In 77 patients (60%), RM events triggered a clinical action, but only 5 patients needed an urgent in-hospital access (4 urgent procedures and 1 device reprogramming).

CONCLUSIONS:

In the unprecedented COVID-19 pandemic, RM became an essential tool in healthcare delivery for CIED patients. We observed that RM was effective in "keep people safe" and "focus only on individuals with health care needs".
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pacemaker, Artificial / Communicable Disease Control / Telemedicine / Defibrillators, Implantable / Pandemics / COVID-19 / Heart Diseases Type of study: Cohort study / Diagnostic study / Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Acta Cardiol Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: 00015385.2020.1847459

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pacemaker, Artificial / Communicable Disease Control / Telemedicine / Defibrillators, Implantable / Pandemics / COVID-19 / Heart Diseases Type of study: Cohort study / Diagnostic study / Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Acta Cardiol Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: 00015385.2020.1847459