Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Prophylactic dressings in the prevention of pressure ulcer related to the use of personal protective equipment by health professionals facing the COVID-19 pandemic: A randomized clinical trial.
Gasparino, Renata Cristina; Lima, Maria Helena Melo; de Souza Oliveira-Kumakura, Ana Railka; da Silva, Vanessa Abreu; de Jesus Meszaros, Mariana; Antunes, Ivan Rogério.
  • Gasparino RC; School of Nursing, University of Campinas - Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Lima MHM; School of Nursing, University of Campinas - Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • de Souza Oliveira-Kumakura AR; School of Nursing, University of Campinas - Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • da Silva VA; University Hospital, University of Campinas - Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • de Jesus Meszaros M; University Hospital, University of Campinas - Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Antunes IR; University Hospital, University of Campinas - Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.
Wound Repair Regen ; 29(1): 183-188, 2021 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-936859
ABSTRACT
Device-related pressure injury (DRPI) is a serious problem that is affecting professionals working on the front lines against COVID-19 due to the prolonged use of personal protective equipment (PPE). In addition to the physical and psychological integrity of professionals, these injuries can compromise the quality of care. Therefore, using technologies to prevent this adverse effect is an urgent matter. This is a parallel two-arm randomized clinical trial without the use of a control group to compare the use of foam and extra-thin hydrocolloid in preventing DRPI associated with the use of PPE by health professionals working on the front lines against coronavirus. In total, 88 professionals were divided into two groups foam and hydrocolloid. Data were collected using two instruments and related to demographic and professional characteristics and skin evaluation. Each volunteer received one of the dressings, both with the same dimensions and arranged over similar regions, and data were gathered at baseline and after 6 or 12 hours. Descriptive and inferential analytic statistical methods were used; the significance level adopted was 5%. No participant developed DRPI, but four areas with hyperemia were observed in the foam group (two in the forehead, one in the cheeks, and one in the nose bridge), as well as four areas with hyperemia in the hydrocolloid group (two in the nose bridge, one in the right ear, and one in the left ear). There was no difference between the groups regarding skin conditions and discomfort (P > .05). The average cost obtained was $ 5.8/person and $ 4.4/person in the foam group and the hydrocolloid group, respectively, considering the dressing measurements. The results show that foam and extra-thin hydrocolloid were effective in preventing DRPI associated with the use of PPE.
Subject(s)

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Health Personnel / Pressure Ulcer / Bandages, Hydrocolloid / Pandemics / Personal Protective Equipment / COVID-19 Type of study: Cohort study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Language: English Journal: Wound Repair Regen Journal subject: Dermatology Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Wrr.12877

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Health Personnel / Pressure Ulcer / Bandages, Hydrocolloid / Pandemics / Personal Protective Equipment / COVID-19 Type of study: Cohort study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Language: English Journal: Wound Repair Regen Journal subject: Dermatology Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Wrr.12877