Your browser doesn't support javascript.
A Flexible Enclosure to Protect Respiratory Therapists During Aerosol-Generating Procedures.
Smith, Cameron R; Gravenstein, Nikolaus; LeMaster, Thomas E; Borde, Ceri M; Fahy, Brenda G.
  • Smith CR; Department of Anesthesiology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida.
  • Gravenstein N; Department of Anesthesiology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida.
  • LeMaster TE; Center for Experiential Learning and Simulation, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida.
  • Borde CM; Center for Experiential Learning and Simulation, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida.
  • Fahy BG; Department of Anesthesiology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida. bfahy@anest.ufl.edu.
Respir Care ; 65(12): 1923-1932, 2020 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-940642
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Exposure of respiratory therapists (RTs) during aerosol-generating procedures such as endotracheal intubation is an occupational hazard. Depending on the hospital, RTs may serve as laryngoscopist or in a role providing ventilation support and initiating mechanical ventilation. This study aimed to evaluate the potential exposure of RTs serving in either of these roles.

METHODS:

We set up a simulated patient with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection in an ICU setting requiring endotracheal intubation involving a laryngoscopist, a nurse, and an RT supporting the laryngoscopist. All participants wore appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE). A fluorescent marker was sprayed by an atomizer during the procedure using 3 different methods for endotracheal intubation. The 3 techniques included PPE alone, a polycarbonate intubating box, or a coronavirus flexible enclosure, which consisted of a Mayo stand with plastic covering. The laryngoscopist and the supporting RT were assessed with a black light for contamination with the fluorescent marker. All simulations were recorded.

RESULTS:

When using only PPE, both the laryngoscopist and the RT were grossly contaminated. When using the intubating box, the laryngoscopist's contamination was detectable only on the gloves the gown and face shield remained uncontaminated; the RT was still grossly contaminated on the gloves, gown, neck, and face shield. When using the coronavirus flexible enclosure system, both the laryngoscopist and the RT were better protected, with contamination detected only on the gloves of the laryngoscopist and the RT.

CONCLUSIONS:

Of the 3 techniques, the coronavirus flexible enclosure contained the fluorescent marker more effectively during endotracheal intubation than PPE alone or the intubating box based on exposure of the laryngoscopist and supporting RT. Optimizing containment during aerosol-generating procedures like endotracheal intubation is a critical component of minimizing occupational and nosocomial spread of SARS-CoV-2 to RTs who may serve as either the laryngoscopist or a support role.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Respiratory Protective Devices / Occupational Exposure / Infectious Disease Transmission, Patient-to-Professional / Personal Protective Equipment / COVID-19 Type of study: Experimental Studies Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Respir Care Year: 2020 Document Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Respiratory Protective Devices / Occupational Exposure / Infectious Disease Transmission, Patient-to-Professional / Personal Protective Equipment / COVID-19 Type of study: Experimental Studies Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Respir Care Year: 2020 Document Type: Article