Your browser doesn't support javascript.
The "sex gap" in COVID-19 trials: a scoping review.
Schiffer, Veronique M M M; Janssen, Emma B N J; van Bussel, Bas C T; Jorissen, Laura L M; Tas, Jeanette; Sels, Jan-Willem E M; Bergmans, Dennis C J J; Dinh, Trang H T; van Kuijk, Sander M J; Hana, Anisa; Mehagnoul-Schipper, Jannet; Scheeren, Clarissa I E; Mesotten, Dieter; Stessel, Bjorn; Marx, Gernot; Hof, Arnoud W J van T; Spaanderman, Marc E A; van Mook, Walther N K A; van der Horst, Iwan C C; Ghossein-Doha, Chahinda.
  • Schiffer VMMM; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Maastricht University Medical Centre (MUMC+), Maastricht, the Netherlands.
  • Janssen EBNJ; GROW, School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, the Netherlands.
  • van Bussel BCT; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Maastricht University Medical Centre (MUMC+), Maastricht, the Netherlands.
  • Jorissen LLM; Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht, the Netherlands.
  • Tas J; Department of Intensive Care, MUMC+, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
  • Sels JEM; Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, the Netherlands.
  • Bergmans DCJJ; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Maastricht University Medical Centre (MUMC+), Maastricht, the Netherlands.
  • Dinh THT; Department of Intensive Care, MUMC+, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
  • van Kuijk SMJ; Department of Intensive Care, MUMC+, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
  • Hana A; Department of Cardiology, MUMC+, Maastricht, MD 6200, the Netherlands.
  • Mehagnoul-Schipper J; Department of Intensive Care, MUMC+, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
  • Scheeren CIE; Department of Cardiology, MUMC+, Maastricht, MD 6200, the Netherlands.
  • Mesotten D; Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, MUMC+, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
  • Stessel B; Department of Intensive Care, Laurentius Ziekenhuis, Roermond, the Netherlands.
  • Marx G; Department of Intensive Care, VieCuri Medisch Centrum, Venlo, the Netherlands.
  • Hof AWJVT; Department of Intensive Care, Zuyderland Medisch Centrum, the Netherlands.
  • Spaanderman MEA; Department of Intensive Care, Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg, Genk, Belgium.
  • van Mook WNKA; Department of Intensive Care, Jessa Hospital, Hasselt, Belgium.
  • van der Horst ICC; Department of Intensive Care, Uniklinik RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
  • Ghossein-Doha C; Department of Cardiology, MUMC+, Maastricht, MD 6200, the Netherlands.
EClinicalMedicine ; 29: 100652, 2020 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-950032
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Many studies investigate the role of pharmacological treatments on disease course in Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). Sex disparities in genetics, immunological responses, and hormonal mechanisms may underlie the substantially higher fatality rates reported in male COVID-19 patients. To optimise care for COVID-19 patients, prophylactic and therapeutic studies should include sex-specific design and analyses. Therefore, in this scoping review, we investigated whether studies on pharmacological treatment in COVID-19 were performed based on a priori sex-specific design or post-hoc sex-specific analyses.

METHODS:

We systematically searched PubMed, EMBASE, UpToDate, clinical trial.org, and MedRxiv for studies on pharmacological treatment for COVID-19 until June 6th, 2020. We included case series, randomized controlled trials, and observational studies in humans (≥18 years) investigating antiviral, antimalarial, and immune system modulating drugs. Data were collected on 1) the proportion of included females, 2) whether sex stratification was performed (a priori by design or post-hoc), and 3) whether effect modification by sex was investigated.

FINDINGS:

30 studies were eligible for inclusion, investigating remdesivir (n = 2), lopinavir/ritonavir (n = 5), favipiravir (n = 1), umifenovir (n = 1), hydroxychloroquine/chloroquine (n = 8), convalescent plasma (n = 6), interleukin-6 (IL-6) pathway inhibitors (n = 5), interleukin-1 (IL-1) pathway inhibitors (n = 1) and corticosteroids (n = 3). Only one study stratified its data based on sex in a post-hoc analysis, whereas none did a priori by design. None of the studies investigated effect modification by sex. A quarter of the studies included twice as many males as females.

INTERPRETATION:

Analyses assessing potential interference of sex with (side-)effects of pharmacological therapy for COVID-19 are rarely reported. Considering sex differences in case-fatality rates and genetic, immunological, and hormonal mechanisms, studies should include sex-specific analyses in their design to optimise COVID-19 care.

FUNDING:

None.
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials / Reviews Language: English Journal: EClinicalMedicine Year: 2020 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: J.eclinm.2020.100652

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials / Reviews Language: English Journal: EClinicalMedicine Year: 2020 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: J.eclinm.2020.100652