Your browser doesn't support javascript.
The Need for Ocular Protection for Health Care Workers During SARS-CoV-2 Outbreak and a Hypothesis for a Potential Personal Protective Equipment.
Wang, Lixiang; Deng, Yingping.
  • Wang L; Department of Ophthalmology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
  • Deng Y; Department of Ophthalmology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Front Public Health ; 8: 599757, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-955282
ABSTRACT
SARS-CoV-2 is a coronavirus with high infectivity and has caused dramatic pressure on health systems all over the world. Appropriate personal protection for medical staffs is critical. For ocular protection, there is ongoing hot debate and concern for potential ocular transmission of SARS-CoV-2. Ocular manifestations and positive detection of viral RNA in ocular samples were only reported in very small number of patients infected with SARS-CoV-2. However, health care workers need to face patients more closely and have higher risk of aerosol contamination. Thus, appropriate ocular protection for medical workers is still recommended by organizations such as WHO and American Academy of Ophthalmology. Although eye goggles provide excellent protection and are mandatory for medical practitioners with high risk of exposure, they are not ideal for common clinical practice, because they can disturb vision due to extensive formation of water droplets and frequently cause moderate to severe discomfort after longtime wearing, which have been reported to interfere with working status. For the majority of medical workers who don't deal with high risk patients, they are not advised to wear goggles in daily practice. However, they also face the risk of infection due to the presence of asymptomatic carriers. Especially in situations with high risk of ocular exposure, such as close physical examination, eye surgery, dental clinics and surgery, ocular protection may be needed. Griffithsin has been shown to directly bind to spike proteins and has anti-viral activity against a broad spectrum of viruses, including coronavirus. Griffithsin is found to inhibit the entry of SARS-CoV at relatively low concentration and is stable and non-toxic. SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV share the same entry receptors and their spike proteins are similar in conformation. We hypothesize that contact lenses containing nanoparticles loaded with griffithsin may provide sufficient ocular protection for medical staffs without high risk of exposure during the outbreak period of SARS-CoV-2. If proven effective, griffithsin-loaded contact lens can be considered as a supplementary ocular protective equipment for medical workers who can tolerate well. The daily disposable contact lens should be applied as needed and refrain from extended wearing in order to reduce potential side effects.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Contact Lenses / Eye Protective Devices / Personal Protective Equipment / COVID-19 Type of study: Prognostic study Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: North America Language: English Journal: Front Public Health Year: 2020 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Fpubh.2020.599757

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Contact Lenses / Eye Protective Devices / Personal Protective Equipment / COVID-19 Type of study: Prognostic study Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: North America Language: English Journal: Front Public Health Year: 2020 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Fpubh.2020.599757