Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Applying the electronic nose for pre-operative SARS-CoV-2 screening.
Wintjens, Anne G W E; Hintzen, Kim F H; Engelen, Sanne M E; Lubbers, Tim; Savelkoul, Paul H M; Wesseling, Geertjan; van der Palen, Job A M; Bouvy, Nicole D.
  • Wintjens AGWE; NUTRIM School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
  • Hintzen KFH; NUTRIM School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
  • Engelen SME; Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
  • Lubbers T; Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
  • Savelkoul PHM; Department of Medical Microbiology, NUTRIM School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
  • Wesseling G; Department of Respiratory Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
  • van der Palen JAM; Department of Research Methodology, Measurement, and Data Analysis, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
  • Bouvy ND; Department of Epidemiology, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Surg Endosc ; 35(12): 6671-6678, 2021 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-956162
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Infection with SARS-CoV-2 causes corona virus disease (COVID-19). The most standard diagnostic method is reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) on a nasopharyngeal and/or an oropharyngeal swab. The high occurrence of false-negative results due to the non-presence of SARS-CoV-2 in the oropharyngeal environment renders this sampling method not ideal. Therefore, a new sampling device is desirable. This proof-of-principle study investigated the possibility to train machine-learning classifiers with an electronic nose (Aeonose) to differentiate between COVID-19-positive and negative persons based on volatile organic compounds (VOCs) analysis.

METHODS:

Between April and June 2020, participants were invited for breath analysis when a swab for RT-PCR was collected. If the RT-PCR resulted negative, the presence of SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies was checked to confirm the negative result. All participants breathed through the Aeonose for five minutes. This device contains metal-oxide sensors that change in conductivity upon reaction with VOCs in exhaled breath. These conductivity changes are input data for machine learning and used for pattern recognition. The result is a value between - 1 and + 1, indicating the infection probability.

RESULTS:

219 participants were included, 57 of which COVID-19 positive. A sensitivity of 0.86 and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 0.92 were found. Adding clinical variables to machine-learning classifier via multivariate logistic regression analysis, the NPV improved to 0.96.

CONCLUSIONS:

The Aeonose can distinguish COVID-19 positive from negative participants based on VOC patterns in exhaled breath with a high NPV. The Aeonose might be a promising, non-invasive, and low-cost triage tool for excluding SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients elected for surgery.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: SARS-CoV-2 / COVID-19 Type of study: Diagnostic study / Prognostic study Topics: Variants Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Surg Endosc Journal subject: Diagnostic Imaging / Gastroenterology Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: S00464-020-08169-0

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: SARS-CoV-2 / COVID-19 Type of study: Diagnostic study / Prognostic study Topics: Variants Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Surg Endosc Journal subject: Diagnostic Imaging / Gastroenterology Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: S00464-020-08169-0