Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Risk assessment and evaluation of China's policy to prevent COVID-19 cases imported by plane.
Pan, Jinhua; Tian, Jie; Xiong, Haiyan; Liu, Zhixi; Yao, Ye; Wang, Yesheng; Zhu, Wenlong; Wang, Yue; Wang, Weibing.
  • Pan J; Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
  • Tian J; Key Laboratory of Public Health Safety of Ministry of Education, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
  • Xiong H; Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
  • Liu Z; Key Laboratory of Public Health Safety of Ministry of Education, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
  • Yao Y; Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
  • Wang Y; Key Laboratory of Public Health Safety of Ministry of Education, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
  • Zhu W; Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
  • Wang Y; Key Laboratory of Public Health Safety of Ministry of Education, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
  • Wang W; Department of Biostatics, School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis ; 14(12): e0008908, 2020 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-962372
ABSTRACT
As of October 5, 2020, China has reported 2,921 cases imported from overseas. Assessing the effectiveness of China's current policies on imported cases abroad is very important for China and other countries that are facing or will face overseas imported cases. In April, we used a susceptible-exposed-infectious-recovered metapopulation model to simulate the epidemic in seven foreign countries, China and the three Chinese key cities. Based on the model outside China, we estimated the proportion of people in incubation period and calculated the risk indexes for Chinese cities through analyzing aviation traffic data from these countries. Based on the model in China and the three key cities, we collected information on control measures and quantified the effectiveness of implementing the current policies at different times and intensities. Our model results showed that Shanghai, Beijing, Qingdao, Guangzhou, and Tianjin have the top five risk indexes. As of April 20, 2020, under current measures, the number of confirmed cases could be reduced by 99% compared with no air traffic restrictions and isolation measures; the reduction could be 93% with isolation of passengers only from key countries. If the current policy were postponed for 7, 10, or 20 days, the increase in the number of confirmed cases would be 1,329, 5,524, and 779,245 respectively, which is 2.1, 5.7, and 662.9 times the number of confirmed cases under current measures. Our research indicates that the importation control measures currently taken by China were implemented at an appropriate time to prevent the epidemic spreading and have achieved relatively good control results. However, it is necessary to remain vigilant; otherwise, another outbreak peak could occur.
Subject(s)

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Air Travel / COVID-19 Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: Asia Language: English Journal: PLoS Negl Trop Dis Journal subject: Tropical Medicine Year: 2020 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Journal.pntd.0008908

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Air Travel / COVID-19 Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: Asia Language: English Journal: PLoS Negl Trop Dis Journal subject: Tropical Medicine Year: 2020 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Journal.pntd.0008908