Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Intervention Effects of the Health Promotion Programme "Join the Healthy Boat" on Objectively Assessed Sedentary Time in Primary School Children in Germany.
Kobel, Susanne; Dreyhaupt, Jens; Wartha, Olivia; Kettner, Sarah; Hoffmann, Belinda; Steinacker, Jürgen M.
  • Kobel S; Division of Sports and Rehabilitation Medicine, Ulm University Hospital, 89075 Ulm, Germany.
  • Dreyhaupt J; Institute for Epidemiology and Medical Biometry, Ulm University, 89075 Ulm, Germany.
  • Wartha O; Division of Sports and Rehabilitation Medicine, Ulm University Hospital, 89075 Ulm, Germany.
  • Kettner S; Division of Sports and Rehabilitation Medicine, Ulm University Hospital, 89075 Ulm, Germany.
  • Hoffmann B; Division of Sports and Rehabilitation Medicine, Ulm University Hospital, 89075 Ulm, Germany.
  • Steinacker JM; Division of Sports and Rehabilitation Medicine, Ulm University Hospital, 89075 Ulm, Germany.
Int J Environ Res Public Health ; 17(23)2020 12 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-963272
ABSTRACT
Sedentary behaviour (SB) in children is related to negative health consequences that can track into adulthood. The programme "Join the Healthy Boat" promotes reduced screen time and a less sedentary lifestyle in schoolchildren. This study investigated the effects of the programme on children's SB. For one year, teachers delivered the programme. A total of 231 children (7.0 ± 0.6 years) participated in the cluster-randomised study; there were 154 one year later at follow-up. Children's SB was assessed using multi-sensor accelerometery, screen time via parental questionnaire. Effects were analysed using (linear) mixed effects regression models. At baseline, children spent 211 (±89) min daily in SB, at follow-up 259 (±109) min/day with no significant difference between the intervention (IG) and control group (CG). SB was higher during weekends (p < 0.01, for CG and IG). However, at follow-up, daily screen time decreased in IG (screen time of >1 h/day baseline 33.3% vs. 27.4%; follow-up 41.2% vs. 27.5%, for CG and IG, respectively). This multi-dimensional, low-threshold intervention for one year does not seem to achieve a significant reduction in children's SB, although screen time decreased in IG. Therefore, it should be considered that screen time cannot be the key contributor to SB and should not solely be used for changing children's SB. However, if screen time is targeted, interventions should promote the replacement of screen time with active alternatives.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Preventive Health Services / Schools / Sedentary Behavior / Health Promotion Type of study: Cohort study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Child / Female / Humans / Male Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: English Year: 2020 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Ijerph17239029

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Preventive Health Services / Schools / Sedentary Behavior / Health Promotion Type of study: Cohort study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Child / Female / Humans / Male Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: English Year: 2020 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Ijerph17239029