Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Social approaches to COVID-19 pandemic response: effectiveness and practicality in sub-Saharan Africa.
Amaechi, Uchenna Anderson; Sodipo, Babasola Olufemi; Nnaji, Chukwudi Arnest; Owoyemi, Ayomide; Omitiran, Kasarachi; Okedo-Alex, Ijeoma Nkem; Eboreime, Ejemai; Ajumobi, Olufemi.
  • Amaechi UA; Strategy, Investment and Impact Division, Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria, Geneva, Switzerland.
  • Sodipo BO; Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, United States of America.
  • Nnaji CA; School of Public Health and Family Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
  • Owoyemi A; Cochrane South Africa, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa.
  • Omitiran K; Department of Biomedical and Health Information Sciences, University of Illinois, Chicago, United States of America.
  • Okedo-Alex IN; Lumiere Health Research Consulting, Abuja, Nigeria.
  • Eboreime E; National Primary Health Care Development Agency (NPHCDA), Abuja, Nigeria.
  • Ajumobi O; Department of Community Medicine, Alex Ekwueme Federal University Teaching Hospital Abakaliki, Nigeria.
Pan Afr Med J ; 37(Suppl 1): 2, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-965233
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

the threat of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic to health systems and communities in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) is enormous. Social approaches such as distancing measures are essential components of the public health response to respiratory-related infectious disease outbreaks. Due to socio-economic and broader peculiarities of SSA countries, social approaches that were effective elsewhere may have limited practicality in these contexts, and if practical; may yield different or even adverse results. We highlighted the effectiveness of these social approaches and their practicality in SSA.

METHODS:

we conducted a comprehensive literature search through multiple databases, to identify articles relevant to social distancing. Findings were thematically summarized.

RESULTS:

our review found emerging and varying empirical evidence on the effectiveness of social approaches in the control and mitigation of the COVID-19 pandemic; thus, limiting its applicability in SSA contexts. Nonetheless, our review demonstrates that the effectiveness and practicality of social approaches in SSA contexts will depend on available resources; timing, duration, and intensity of the intervention; and compliance. Weak political coordination, anti-science sentiments, distrust of political leaders and limited implementation of legal frameworks can also affect practicality.

CONCLUSION:

to overcome these challenges, tailoring and adaptation of these measures to different but unique contexts for maximum effectiveness, and investment in social insurance mechanisms, are vital.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Quarantine / Physical Distancing / COVID-19 Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: Africa Language: English Journal: Pan Afr Med J Year: 2020 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Pamj.supp.2020.37.2.25183

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Quarantine / Physical Distancing / COVID-19 Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: Africa Language: English Journal: Pan Afr Med J Year: 2020 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Pamj.supp.2020.37.2.25183