Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Clinical evaluation of commercial automated SARS-CoV-2 immunoassays.
Kittel, Maximilian; Muth, Maria Christina; Zahn, Ingrid; Roth, Heinz-Jürgen; Thiaucourt, Margot; Gerhards, Catharina; Haselmann, Verena; Neumaier, Michael; Findeisen, Peter.
  • Kittel M; Institute for Clinical Chemistry, Medical Faculty Mannheim of the University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany. Electronic address: maximilian.kittel@umm.de.
  • Muth MC; MVZ Laboratory Dr. Limbach & Colleagues, Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Zahn I; MVZ Laboratory Dr. Limbach & Colleagues, Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Roth HJ; MVZ Laboratory Dr. Limbach & Colleagues, Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Thiaucourt M; Institute for Clinical Chemistry, Medical Faculty Mannheim of the University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.
  • Gerhards C; Institute for Clinical Chemistry, Medical Faculty Mannheim of the University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.
  • Haselmann V; Institute for Clinical Chemistry, Medical Faculty Mannheim of the University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.
  • Neumaier M; Institute for Clinical Chemistry, Medical Faculty Mannheim of the University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.
  • Findeisen P; MVZ Laboratory Dr. Limbach & Colleagues, Heidelberg, Germany.
Int J Infect Dis ; 103: 590-596, 2021 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-967501
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

Numerous immunoassays for detecting antibodies directed against SARS-CoV-2 have been rapidly developed and released. Validations of these have been performed with a limited number of samples. The lack of standardisation might lead to significantly different results. This study compared ten automated assays from six vendors in terms of sensitivity, specificity and reproducibility.

METHODS:

This study compared ten fully automated immunoassays from the following vendors Diasorin, Epitope Diagnostics, Euroimmun, Roche, YHLO, and Snibe. The retrospective part of the study included patients with a laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 infection, and controls comprised patients with a suspected infection, in whom the disease was excluded. Furthermore, biobanked sera were taken as negative controls (n = 97). The retrospective part involved four groups (1) laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 infection (n = 183); (1B) suspected COVID-19 infection (n = 167) without a qRT-PCR result but positive serological results from at least two different assays, and suspected COVID-19 infection due to a positive serological result from the Roche assay (n = 295); (2) biobanked sera obtained from patients before the emergence of SARS-CoV-2 (n = 97) as negative controls; and (2A) probably COVID-19-negative sera with negative serological results from at least two different assays (n = 152).

RESULTS:

Overall diagnostic sensitivities were Euroimmun (IgA) 87%; Epitope Diagnostics (IgG) 83%; YHLO (IgG) 77%; Roche (IgM/IgG) 77%; Euroimmun (IgG) 75%; Diasorin (IgG) 53%; Epitope Diagnostics (IgM) 52%; Snibe (IgG) 47%; YHLO (IgM) 35%; and Snibe (IgM) 26%. Diagnostic specificities were YHLO (IgG) 100%; Roche, 100%; Snibe (IgM/IgG) 100%; Diasorin (IgG) 97%; Euroimmun (IgG) 94%; YHLO (IgM) 94%; Euroimmun (IgA) 83%.

CONCLUSION:

Assays from different vendors substantially varied in terms of their performance. These findings might facilitate selection of appropriate serological assays.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Immunoassay / SARS-CoV-2 / COVID-19 / Antibodies, Viral Type of study: Diagnostic study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: English Journal: Int J Infect Dis Journal subject: Communicable Diseases Year: 2021 Document Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Immunoassay / SARS-CoV-2 / COVID-19 / Antibodies, Viral Type of study: Diagnostic study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: English Journal: Int J Infect Dis Journal subject: Communicable Diseases Year: 2021 Document Type: Article