Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Protection Level and Reusability of a Modified Full-Face Snorkel Mask as Alternative Personal Protective Equipment for Healthcare Workers during the COVID-19 Pandemic.
Schmitt, Jean; Jones, Lewis S; Aeby, Elise A; Gloor, Christian; Moser, Berthold; Wang, Jing.
  • Schmitt J; Institute of Environmental Engineering, Department of Civil, Environmental and Geomatic Engineering, ETH Zurich, Zurich 8093, Switzerland.
  • Jones LS; Laboratory for Advanced Analytical Technologies, EMPA, Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology, Dubendorf 8600, Switzerland.
  • Aeby EA; Institute for Chemical- and Bioengineering, Department of Chemistry and Applied Biosciences, ETH Zurich, Zurich 8093, Switzerland.
  • Gloor C; Laboratory of Applied Mechanobiology, Department of Health Sciences and Technology, ETH Zurich, Zurich 8093, Switzerland.
  • Moser B; Spiez Laboratory Division CBRNe Protection Systems, Federal Office of Civil Protection, Spiez 3700, Switzerland.
  • Wang J; Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck 6020 Austria.
Chem Res Toxicol ; 34(1): 110-118, 2021 01 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-983873
Preprint
This scientific journal article is probably based on a previously available preprint. It has been identified through a machine matching algorithm, human confirmation is still pending.
See preprint
ABSTRACT
The worldwide outbreak of COVID-19 has drastically increased pressure on medical resources and highlighted the need for rapidly available, large-scale, and low-cost personal protective equipment (PPE). In this work, an alternative full-face mask is adapted from a modified snorkel mask to be used as PPE with two medical-grade filters and a 3D-printed adapter. Since the mask covers the eyes, mouth, and nose, it acts as a full-face shield, providing additional protection to healthcare workers. The SARS-CoV-2 has a size between 60 nm and 140 nm, and airborne viral particles can be carried by larger droplets with sizes up to several millimeters. The minimum filtration efficiency of mechanical and electrostatic filters is usually reached between 30 nm and 300 nm. The filtration efficiency of different medical filters is measured for particles below 300 nm to cover the size of the SARS-CoV-2 and small virus-laden droplets, and determine the minimum efficiency. The filtration performance of the adapted full-face mask is characterized using NaCl particles below 500 nm and different fitting scenarios to determine the minimum protection efficiency. The mask is compared to a commercial respirator and characterized according to the EN 149 standard, demonstrating that the protection fulfills the requirements for the FFP2 level (filtering face-piece 2, stopping at least 94% of airborne particles). The device shows a good resistance to several cycles of decontamination (autoclaving and ethanol immersion), is easy to be produced locally at low cost, and helps to address the shortage in FFP2 masks and face shields by providing adequate protection to healthcare workers against particles <500 nm in size.
Subject(s)

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pneumonia, Viral / Health Personnel / Equipment Reuse / Pandemics / Personal Protective Equipment / COVID-19 / Masks Type of study: Observational study Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Chem Res Toxicol Journal subject: Toxicology Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Acs.chemrestox.0c00371

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pneumonia, Viral / Health Personnel / Equipment Reuse / Pandemics / Personal Protective Equipment / COVID-19 / Masks Type of study: Observational study Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Chem Res Toxicol Journal subject: Toxicology Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Acs.chemrestox.0c00371