Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Continued Counseling for the Relationship Between State-Level Medicine and Public Health.
Scutchfield, F Douglas; Howard, Jeffrey D; Gouge, Kaylee R; Malone, Payton D; Wilson, Kaylee N.
  • Scutchfield FD; Department of Health Management and Policy, College of Public Health, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky.
  • Howard JD; Department of Public Health; University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky.
  • Gouge KR; Department of Health Management and Policy, College of Public Health, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky. Electronic address: kaylee.gouge@uky.edu.
  • Malone PD; Department of Health Management and Policy, College of Public Health, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky.
  • Wilson KN; Department of Health Management and Policy, College of Public Health, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky.
Am J Prev Med ; 60(3): e131-e138, 2021 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-986986
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Public health and organized medicine have operated somewhat independently of each other since the early 1900s. In the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, the necessity of healing any divide between organized medicine and state and local health officials seems self-evident. Using the recommendations abstracted from a 2005 article by Dr. Ronald Davis, "Marriage Counseling for Medicine and Public Health," this cross-sectional study explores the formal relationships that existed between state-level public health and medical practice across the U.S. at the end of 2019.

METHODS:

A questionnaire was distributed to every state's senior public health official and medical society executive (N=104) between August and December 2019 to examine the extent of these entities' partnerships. Analysis was completed in January 2020.

RESULTS:

Among the respondents, 40%-63.1% (n=65) currently engage in the recommended activities, with 1 exception state health departments infrequently invite medical society executives to speak at major conferences or meetings (26.2%). The majority of respondents (71.1%-85.9%) judged that each recommended activity would improve the practices of medicine and public health.

CONCLUSIONS:

Survey results illustrate a desire for reconciliation, but poor implementation of recommended strategies aimed at building a healthy marriage between the 2 sectors. More formal efforts are needed among state medical and public health organizations to capitalize on the current climate of rapprochement. The burden of COVID-19 on the national health system could provide a worthy cause around which these efforts would coalesce.
Subject(s)

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Public Health Administration / Societies, Medical / State Government / Intersectoral Collaboration / COVID-19 Type of study: Observational study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: North America / Caribbean / Puerto Rico Language: English Journal: Am J Prev Med Journal subject: Public Health Year: 2021 Document Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Public Health Administration / Societies, Medical / State Government / Intersectoral Collaboration / COVID-19 Type of study: Observational study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: North America / Caribbean / Puerto Rico Language: English Journal: Am J Prev Med Journal subject: Public Health Year: 2021 Document Type: Article