Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Impact of personal protective equipment on prehospital endotracheal intubation performance in simulated manikin.
Çaglar, Ahmet; Kaçer, Ilker; Hacimustafaoglu, Muhammet; Öztürk, Berkant; Öztürk, Sema.
  • Çaglar A; Department of Emergency Medicine, Aksaray University Training and Research Hospital, Aksaray, Turkey. Electronic address: drcaglar4@gmail.com.
  • Kaçer I; Department of Emergency Medicine, Aksaray University Training and Research Hospital, Aksaray, Turkey. Electronic address: ik0626@hotmail.com.
  • Hacimustafaoglu M; Department of Emergency Medicine, Aksaray University Training and Research Hospital, Aksaray, Turkey. Electronic address: muhammethmd@gmail.com.
  • Öztürk B; Department of Emergency Medicine, Aksaray University Training and Research Hospital, Aksaray, Turkey. Electronic address: drberkantozturk@windowslive.com.
  • Öztürk S; Department of Emergency Medicine, Aksaray University Training and Research Hospital, Aksaray, Turkey. Electronic address: drsemaunal@hotmail.com.
Australas Emerg Care ; 24(3): 235-239, 2021 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-987097
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Tracheal intubation in COVID-19 patients is a potentially high-risk procedure for healthcare professionals. Personal protective equipment (PPE) is recommended to minimize contact with critical patients with COVID-19 infection. This study aimed to primarily examine the effect of PPE use on intubation time and success rate among prehospital healthcare professionals; additionally, we compared intubation times among prehospital health care professionals using PPE with direct laryngoscopy and video laryngoscopy assistance.

METHODS:

In this prospective simulation study, we compared the intubation times and success rates among prehospital healthcare professionals who were or were not using PPE. Furthermore, demographic data, previous intubation experience, and previous intubation experience with PPE were recorded.

RESULTS:

Overall time to intubation with PPE use was 51.28±3.89s, which was significantly higher than that without PPE use (33.03±2.65s; p<0.001). In addition, the overall success rate with PPE use was 74.4%, which was significantly lower than that without PPE use (93%;p<0.001). PPE use increased the average intubation time by 19.73±2.59s with direct laryngoscopy and by 16.81±2.86s with video laryngoscopy (p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS:

PPE use is associated with increased intubation time and decreased success rate. Video laryngoscopy assistance in cases where PPE use is required facilitates faster endotracheal intubation than does direct laryngoscopy assistance.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Emergency Medical Services / Personal Protective Equipment / COVID-19 / Intubation, Intratracheal Type of study: Cohort study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Australas Emerg Care Year: 2021 Document Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Emergency Medical Services / Personal Protective Equipment / COVID-19 / Intubation, Intratracheal Type of study: Cohort study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Australas Emerg Care Year: 2021 Document Type: Article