Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Comparison of the Clinical Performances of the Abbott Alinity IgG, Abbott Architect IgM, and Roche Elecsys Total SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Assays.
Harley, Kellisha; Gunsolus, Ian L.
  • Harley K; Wisconsin Diagnostic Laboratories, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA.
  • Gunsolus IL; Medical College of Wisconsin, Department of Pathology, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA igunsolus@mcw.edu.
J Clin Microbiol ; 59(1)2020 12 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-991747
ABSTRACT
Critical evaluation of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) serologic assays is needed to guide clinical decision-making and ensure that these assays provide optimal benefit to patients and the public. Here, three commercially available assays with widespread distribution capabilities are compared. A total of 667 specimens, 103 from patients with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infections and 564 collected prior to the emergence of SARS-CoV-2, were analyzed in parallel using the Roche Elecsys SARS-CoV-2 total antibody and Abbott Alinity SARS-CoV-2 IgG assays; a subset of 55 samples from patients with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infections was additionally evaluated using the Abbott Architect SARS-CoV-2 IgM assay. Qualitative agreement between the Abbott IgG and Roche total antibody assays was 98.7% (658/667), with Cohen's kappa value of 0.919 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.867 to 0.972). Qualitative agreements with the Abbott IgM assay were 92.7% (51/55, Abbott IgG) and 85.5% (47/55, Roche total antibody). Diagnostic specificities determined using pre-COVID-19 samples for the Abbott IgG and Roche total antibody assays were 99.65% (95% CI, 98.72 to 99.90%) and 100.00% (95% CI, 99.32 to 100.00%), respectively, spanning claims made by each manufacturer. Diagnostic sensitivities increased for all three assays with increasing time since the onset of symptoms. Among 51 patients with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infections, 23 (45.1%), 24 (47.1%), and 22 (43.1%) were reactive by the Abbott IgG, Roche total antibody, and Abbott IgM assays, respectively, with sampling times 0 to 56 days post-positive PCR (median/mean, 2/6.2 days). Combining IgG and IgM screening identified 4/55 additional samples with detectable antibodies that would not have been observed using the assays independently. Notably, one immunocompromised patient with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection showed no detectable antibodies using any of the three assays 43 days after onset of symptoms.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Immunoglobulin G / Immunoglobulin M / COVID-19 Serological Testing / COVID-19 / Antibodies, Viral Type of study: Diagnostic study / Experimental Studies / Prognostic study / Qualitative research Limits: Humans Language: English Year: 2020 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: JCM.02104-20

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Immunoglobulin G / Immunoglobulin M / COVID-19 Serological Testing / COVID-19 / Antibodies, Viral Type of study: Diagnostic study / Experimental Studies / Prognostic study / Qualitative research Limits: Humans Language: English Year: 2020 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: JCM.02104-20