This article is a Preprint
Preprints are preliminary research reports that have not been certified by peer review. They should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Preprints posted online allow authors to receive rapid feedback and the entire scientific community can appraise the work for themselves and respond appropriately. Those comments are posted alongside the preprints for anyone to read them and serve as a post publication assessment.
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) seroprevalence: Navigating the absence of a gold standard (preprint)
medrxiv; 2021.
Preprint
in English
| medRxiv | ID: ppzbmed-10.1101.2021.05.11.21256992
ABSTRACT
Background:
Multiple anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoassays are available, but no gold standard exists. We assessed four assays using various methodological approaches to estimate SARS-COV-2 seroprevalence during the first COVID-19 wave in Canada.Methods:
This serial cross-sectional study was conducted using plasma samples from healthy blood donors between April-September 2020. Qualitative assessment of SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies was based on four assays Abbott Architect SARS-Cov-2 IgG assay (target nucleocapsid) (Abbott-NP) and three in-house IgG ELISA assays (target spike glycoprotein (Spike), spike receptor binding domain (RBD), and nucleocapsid (NP)). Seroprevalence was estimated using multiple composite reference standards (CRS) and by a series of Bayesian Latent Class Models (BLCM) (using uninformative, weakly, and informative priors).Results:
8999 blood samples were tested. The Abbott-NP assay consistently estimated seroprevalence to be lower than the ELISA-based assays. Discordance between assays was common, 13 unique diagnostic phenotypes were observed. Only 32 samples (0.4%) were positive by all four assays. BLCM using uninformative priors predicted seroprevalence increased from 0.7% (95% credible interval (CrI); 0.4, 1.0%) in April/May to 0.8% (95% CrI 0.5, 1.2%) in June/July to 1.1% (95% CrI 0.7, 1.6) in August/September. Results from CRS were very similar to the BLCM. Assay characteristics varied considerably over time. Overall spike had the highest sensitivity (89.1% (95% CrI 79.2, 96.9%), while the sensitivity of the Abbott-NP assay waned from 65.3% (95% CrI 43.6, 85.0%) in April/May to 45.9% (95% CrI 27.8, 65.6) by August/September.Discussion:
We found low SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence rates at the end of the first wave and estimates derived from single assays may be biased.
Full text:
Available
Collection:
Preprints
Database:
medRxiv
Main subject:
Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome
/
COVID-19
Language:
English
Year:
2021
Document Type:
Preprint
Similar
MEDLINE
...
LILACS
LIS