This article is a Preprint
Preprints are preliminary research reports that have not been certified by peer review. They should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Preprints posted online allow authors to receive rapid feedback and the entire scientific community can appraise the work for themselves and respond appropriately. Those comments are posted alongside the preprints for anyone to read them and serve as a post publication assessment.
Mechanistic origin of different binding affinities of SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2 spike RBDs to human ACE2 (preprint)
biorxiv; 2022.
Preprint
in English
| bioRxiv | ID: ppzbmed-10.1101.2022.02.05.479221
ABSTRACT
The receptor-binding domain (RBD) of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein mediates viral entry into host cells through binding to the cell-surface receptor angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2). It has been shown that SARS-CoV-2 RBD (RBDCoV2) has a higher binding affinity to human ACE2 than its highly homologous SARS-CoV RBD (RBDCoV), for which the mechanistic reasons still remain to be elucidated. Here, we used the multiple-replica molecular dynamics (MD) simulations, molecular mechanics Poisson-Boltzmann surface area (MM-PBSA) binding free energy calculations, and interface residue contact network (IRCN) analysis approach to explore the mechanistic origin of different ACE2 binding affinities of these two RBDs. The results demonstrate that, when compared to the RBDCoV2-ACE2 complex, the RBDCoV-ACE2 complex features the enhanced overall structural fluctuations and inter-protein positional movements and increased conformational entropy and diversity. The inter-protein electrostatic attractive interactions are a dominant force in determining the high ACE2 affinities of both RBDs, while the significantly strengthened electrostatic forces of attraction of ACE2 to RBDCoV2 determine the higher ACE2 binding affinity of RBDCoV2 than of RBDCoV. Comprehensive comparative analyses of the residue binding free energy components and IRCNs reveal that, although any RBD residue substitution involved in the charge change can significantly impact the inter-protein electrostatic interaction strength, it is the substitutions at the RBD interface that lead to the overall stronger electrostatic attractive force of RBDCoV2-ACE2, which in turn not only tightens the interface packing and suppresses the dynamics of RBDCoV2-ACE2, but also enhances the ACE2 binding affinity of RBDCoV2 compared to that of RBDCoV. Since the RBD residue substitutions involving gain/loss of the positively/negatively charged residues, in particular those near/at the binding interfaces with the potential to form hydrogen bonds and/or salt bridges with ACE2, can greatly enhance the ACE2 binding affinity, the SARS-CoV-2 variants carrying such mutations should be paid special attention to.
Full text:
Available
Collection:
Preprints
Database:
bioRxiv
Main subject:
Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome
Language:
English
Year:
2022
Document Type:
Preprint
Similar
MEDLINE
...
LILACS
LIS