This article is a Preprint
Preprints are preliminary research reports that have not been certified by peer review. They should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Preprints posted online allow authors to receive rapid feedback and the entire scientific community can appraise the work for themselves and respond appropriately. Those comments are posted alongside the preprints for anyone to read them and serve as a post publication assessment.
COVID-19 inequalities in England: a mathematical modelling study of transmission risk and clinical vulnerability by socioeconomic status (preprint)
medrxiv; 2024.
Preprint
in English
| medRxiv | ID: ppzbmed-10.1101.2024.01.11.24301159
ABSTRACT
BackgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic resulted in major inequalities in infection burden between areas of varying socioeconomic deprivation in many countries, including England. Areas of higher deprivation tend to have a different population structure - generally younger - which can increase viral transmission due to higher contact rates in school-going children and working-age adults. Higher deprivation is also associated with higher presence of chronic comorbidities, which were convincingly demonstrated to be risk factors for severe COVID-19 disease. These two major factors need to be combined to better understand and quantify their relative importance in the observed COVID-19 inequalities. MethodsWe used UK Census data on health status and demography stratified by decile of the Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD), which is a measure of socioeconomic deprivation. We calculated epidemiological impact using an age-stratified COVID-19 transmission model, which incorporated different contact patterns and clinical health profile by decile. To separate the contribution of each factor, we also considered a scenario where the clinical health profile of all deciles was at the level of the least deprived. We also considered the effectiveness of school closures in each decile. ResultsIn the modelled epidemics in urban areas, the most deprived decile experienced 9% more infections, 13% more clinical cases, and a 97% larger peak clinical size than the least deprived; we found similar inequalities in rural areas. 21% of clinical cases and 16% of deaths in England observed under the model assumptions would not occur if all deciles experienced the clinical health profile of the least deprived decile. We found that more deaths were prevented in more affluent areas during school closures. ConclusionsThis study demonstrates that both clinical and demographic factors synergise to generate health inequalities in COVID-19, that improving the clinical health profile of populations would increase health equity, and that some interventions can increase health inequalities.
Full text:
Available
Collection:
Preprints
Database:
medRxiv
Main subject:
Death
/
COVID-19
Language:
English
Year:
2024
Document Type:
Preprint
Similar
MEDLINE
...
LILACS
LIS