Comparing SARS-CoV-2 sequencing methodologies during early phase detection of the Delta variant in South Africa (preprint)

ABSTRACT

Background: Genomic surveillance, with the aid of next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies, revolutionized the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Coupled with high-performance analysis software, methodologies such as the Ion Torrent S5 and Illumina MiSeq dramatically improved the genomic surveillance capacity within South Africa during the height of the pandemic. Using de-identified remnant samples collected from Eastern Cape and analysis software, Genome Detective and NextClade, we compared the sequencing process, genomic coverage, quantification of mutations, and clade classification from sequence data generated by these two common “benchtop” NGS platforms. Results: Sequence data analysis revealed success rates of 175/183 (96%) and 172/183 (94%) on the Ion Torrent S5 and Illumina MiSeq, respectively. Internal quality metrics were assessed in terms of genomic coverage (>80%) and the number of mutations identified (<100). A greater number of higher-genomic coverage sequences were generated on the Ion Torrent S5 (99%) than on the Illumina MiSeq (80%) and <100 mutations was obtained by both platforms. Ion Torrent S5 generated high coverage sequences from samples having a broader range of viral loads (VL) compared to the Illumina MiSeq, which was less successful in sequencing samples with lower viral loads. Clade assignments were comparable across platforms which accurately differentiated between Beta (<45%) and Delta (≤30%) VOCs. A disparity in clade assignment was observed in <10% of sequences due to poor coverage obtained on the Illumina MiSeq, followed by a failure rate of ≤6% across the two platforms. Manual library preparation found both methods similar in terms of sample processing, handling of larger sample quantities, and clade assignment for SARS-CoV-2. Variability between the Ion Torrent S5 and Illumina MiSeq was observed in sequencing run duration (3,5 hrs vs 36 hrs), sequencing process (semi-automation vs manual), genomic coverage (99% vs 80%), and viral load requirements (broad range vs high VL). Conclusion: The Illumina MiSeq and Ion Torrent S5 are both reliable platforms capable of performing WGS with the use of amplicons and providing specific, accurate, and high throughput analysis of the SARS-CoV-2 whole viral genomes. Both sequencing platforms are feasible platforms for the genomic surveillance of SARS-CoV-2, each with its specific advantages and trade-offs.