This article is a Preprint
Preprints are preliminary research reports that have not been certified by peer review. They should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Preprints posted online allow authors to receive rapid feedback and the entire scientific community can appraise the work for themselves and respond appropriately. Those comments are posted alongside the preprints for anyone to read them and serve as a post publication assessment.
Timing and Depth Selection for Sedated Gastroscopy After SARS-CoV-2 Infection—A Retrospective Cohort Study (preprint)
researchsquare; 2024.
Preprint
in English
| PREPRINT-RESEARCHSQUARE | ID: ppzbmed-10.21203.rs.3.rs-4250743.v1
ABSTRACT
Background Sedated gastroscopy is a crucial procedure for patients with upper respiratory infections. SARS-CoV-2-infected patients are more susceptible to anesthesia-related complications, such as edema, pharyngeal mucosa congestion, laryngospasm, and pulmonary infections.Methods We retrospectively analyzed a total of 386 patients who underwent sedated gastroscopy at the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University during the SARS-CoV-2 infection period. The patients were divided into three groups based on SARS-CoV-2 status Negative (N), Two-week post-SARS-CoV-2 infection (T), and Three-week post-SARS-CoV-2 infection (Th) groups. Based on the anesthesia method, patients were divided into mild/moderate sedation and deep sedation/general anesthesia groups. Additionally, patients were categorized into groups based on COVID-19 severity and vaccination status. We recorded the laryngeal mucosal conditions, the occurrence rates of adverse reactions such as coughing, laryngospasm, and transient oxygen desaturation during the examination, as well as the satisfaction of patients and endoscopists were recorded.Results The T group displayed a significantly higher occurrence rate of adverse reactions when compared to the N and Th group, with decreased satisfaction levels of patients and endoscopists. In the T group, the occurrence rate of adverse reactions was higher in mild to moderate sedation than in deep sedation/general anesthesia methods, while patient and endoscopist satisfaction was lower. In the Th group, there was no statistically significant difference in the examination success rate or patient satisfaction between the mild/moderate sedation and deep sedation/general anesthesia methods; however, endoscopist satisfaction was lower with mild/moderate sedation method than deep sedation/general anesthesia method. There was a significant difference in the gastroscopy success rates of patients with different COVID-19 classifications. A significant difference was observed in the gastroscopy success rates among patients with different vaccination statuses.Conclusions Sedated gastroscopy post-three weeks of SARS-CoV-2 infection is safe. Moreover, using a deep sedation/general anesthesia method for sedated gastroscopy in SARS-CoV-2-infected patients within three weeks is significantly safer.
Full text:
Available
Collection:
Preprints
Database:
PREPRINT-RESEARCHSQUARE
Main subject:
Pulmonary Embolism
/
Respiratory Tract Infections
/
Laryngismus
/
Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome
/
Edema
/
COVID-19
Language:
English
Year:
2024
Document Type:
Preprint
Similar
MEDLINE
...
LILACS
LIS