Your browser doesn't support javascript.
The use of oxygen hoods in patients failing on conventional high-flow oxygen delivery systems, the effects on oxygenation, mechanical ventilation and mortality rates in hypoxic patients with COVID-19. A Prospective Controlled Cohort Study.
Dayya, David; O'Neill, Owen J; Feiertag, Tracy D; Tuazon-Boer, Ritzel; Sullivan, John; Perez, Lubiha; Gurash, Sandrah; Eaton, Matthew; Bodley, Taylor; Marker, Joanne; Smykowski, Elizabeth; Hall, T.
  • Dayya D; Division of Undersea and Hyperbaric Medicine, Department of Surgery, Phelps Hospital - Northwell Health, Sleepy Hollow, NY, USA; Division of Undersea and Hyperbaric Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Upstate Medical University, State University of NY, Syracuse, NY, USA; Department of Intern
  • O'Neill OJ; Division of Undersea and Hyperbaric Medicine, Department of Surgery, Phelps Hospital - Northwell Health, Sleepy Hollow, NY, USA; Division of Undersea and Hyperbaric Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Upstate Medical University, State University of NY, Syracuse, NY, USA; Department of Intern
  • Feiertag TD; Division of Undersea and Hyperbaric Medicine, Department of Surgery, Phelps Hospital - Northwell Health, Sleepy Hollow, NY, USA; Division of Undersea and Hyperbaric Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Upstate Medical University, State University of NY, Syracuse, NY, USA. Electronic address:
  • Tuazon-Boer R; Division of Undersea and Hyperbaric Medicine, Department of Surgery, Phelps Hospital - Northwell Health, Sleepy Hollow, NY, USA; Division of Undersea and Hyperbaric Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Upstate Medical University, State University of NY, Syracuse, NY, USA. Electronic address:
  • Sullivan J; Division of Undersea and Hyperbaric Medicine, Department of Surgery, Phelps Hospital - Northwell Health, Sleepy Hollow, NY, USA; Division of Undersea and Hyperbaric Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Upstate Medical University, State University of NY, Syracuse, NY, USA. Electronic address:
  • Perez L; Division of Undersea and Hyperbaric Medicine, Department of Surgery, Phelps Hospital - Northwell Health, Sleepy Hollow, NY, USA; Division of Undersea and Hyperbaric Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Upstate Medical University, State University of NY, Syracuse, NY, USA. Electronic address:
  • Gurash S; Division of Undersea and Hyperbaric Medicine, Department of Surgery, Phelps Hospital - Northwell Health, Sleepy Hollow, NY, USA; Division of Undersea and Hyperbaric Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Upstate Medical University, State University of NY, Syracuse, NY, USA. Electronic address:
  • Eaton M; Division of Undersea and Hyperbaric Medicine, Department of Surgery, Phelps Hospital - Northwell Health, Sleepy Hollow, NY, USA; Division of Undersea and Hyperbaric Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Upstate Medical University, State University of NY, Syracuse, NY, USA. Electronic address:
  • Bodley T; Division of Undersea and Hyperbaric Medicine, Department of Surgery, Phelps Hospital - Northwell Health, Sleepy Hollow, NY, USA; Division of Undersea and Hyperbaric Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Upstate Medical University, State University of NY, Syracuse, NY, USA. Electronic address:
  • Marker J; Division of Undersea and Hyperbaric Medicine, Department of Surgery, Phelps Hospital - Northwell Health, Sleepy Hollow, NY, USA; Division of Undersea and Hyperbaric Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Upstate Medical University, State University of NY, Syracuse, NY, USA. Electronic address:
  • Smykowski E; Division of Undersea and Hyperbaric Medicine, Department of Surgery, Phelps Hospital - Northwell Health, Sleepy Hollow, NY, USA; Division of Undersea and Hyperbaric Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Upstate Medical University, State University of NY, Syracuse, NY, USA. Electronic address:
  • Hall T; Division of Undersea and Hyperbaric Medicine, Department of Surgery, Phelps Hospital - Northwell Health, Sleepy Hollow, NY, USA; Division of Undersea and Hyperbaric Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Upstate Medical University, State University of NY, Syracuse, NY, USA. Electronic address:
Respir Med ; 179: 106312, 2021 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1081264
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Efforts to meet increased oxygen demands in COVID-19 patients are a priority in averting mechanical ventilation (MV), associated with high mortality approaching 76.4-97.2%. Novel methods of oxygen delivery could mitigate that risk. Oxygen hoods/helmets may improve O2-saturation (SaO2), reduce in-hospital mechanical ventilation and mortality rates, and reduce length of hospitalization in hypoxic Covid-19 patients failing on conventional high-flow oxygen delivery systems.

METHODS:

DesignProspective Controlled Cohort Study. SettingSingle Center. ParticipantsAll patients admitted with a diagnosis of COVID-19 were reviewed and 136/347 patients met inclusion criteria. Study period3/6/2020 to 5/1/2020. 136 participants completed the study with known status for all outcome measures. Intervention or exposureOxygen hoods/helmets as compared to conventional high-flow oxygen delivery systems. MAIN OUTCOME(S) AND MEASURE(S) 1) Pre and post change in oxygen saturation (SaO2). 2) In-hospital Mechanical Ventilation (MV). 3) In-hospital Mortality. 4) Length of hospitalization.

RESULTS:

136 patients including 58-intervention and 78-control patients were studied. Age, gender, and other demographics/prognostic indicators were comparable between cohorts. Oxygen hoods averted imminent or immediate intubation/MV in all 58 COVID-19 patients failing on conventional high-flow oxygen delivery systems with a mean improvement in SaO2 of 8.8%, p < 0.001. MV rates were observed to be higher in the control 37/78 (47.4%) as compared to the intervention cohort 23/58 (39.7%), a difference of 7.7%, a 27% risk reduction, not statistically significant, OR 95%CI 0.73 (0.37-1.5). Mortality rates were observed higher in the control 54/78 (69.2%) as compared to the intervention cohort 36/58 (62.1%), a difference of 7.1%, a 27% risk reduction, not statistically significant OR 95%CI 0.73 (0.36-1.5).

CONCLUSION:

Oxygen hoods demonstrate improvement in SaO2 for patients failing on conventional high-flow oxygen-delivery systems and prevented imminent mechanical ventilation. In-hospital mechanical ventilation and mortality rates were reduced with the use of oxygen hoods but not found to be statistically significant. The oxygen hood is a safe, effective oxygen-delivery system which may reduce intubation/MV and mortality rates. Their use should be considered in treating hypoxic COVID-19 patients. Further research is warranted. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT04407260.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: Disponible Colección: Bases de datos internacionales Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Consumo de Oxígeno / Terapia por Inhalación de Oxígeno / Respiración Artificial / COVID-19 / Hipoxia Tipo de estudio: Estudio de cohorte / Estudio experimental / Estudio observacional / Estudio pronóstico / Ensayo controlado aleatorizado Tópicos: Covid persistente Límite: Adulto / Anciano / Femenino / Humanos / Masculino / Middle aged País/Región como asunto: America del Norte Idioma: Inglés Revista: Respir Med Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Artículo

Similares

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Texto completo: Disponible Colección: Bases de datos internacionales Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Consumo de Oxígeno / Terapia por Inhalación de Oxígeno / Respiración Artificial / COVID-19 / Hipoxia Tipo de estudio: Estudio de cohorte / Estudio experimental / Estudio observacional / Estudio pronóstico / Ensayo controlado aleatorizado Tópicos: Covid persistente Límite: Adulto / Anciano / Femenino / Humanos / Masculino / Middle aged País/Región como asunto: America del Norte Idioma: Inglés Revista: Respir Med Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Artículo