Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Assessment of dispersion of airborne particles of oral/nasal fluid by high flow nasal cannula therapy.
Jermy, M C; Spence, C J T; Kirton, R; O'Donnell, J F; Kabaliuk, N; Gaw, S; Hockey, H; Jiang, Y; Zulkhairi Abidin, Z; Dougherty, R L; Rowe, P; Mahaliyana, A S; Gibbs, A; Roberts, S A.
  • Jermy MC; Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.
  • Spence CJT; Fisher and Paykel Healthcare, Auckland, New Zealand.
  • Kirton R; Fisher and Paykel Healthcare, Auckland, New Zealand.
  • O'Donnell JF; Fisher and Paykel Healthcare, Auckland, New Zealand.
  • Kabaliuk N; School of Nursing College of Health, Massey University, Auckland, New Zealand.
  • Gaw S; Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.
  • Hockey H; School of Physical and Chemical Sciences, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.
  • Jiang Y; Biometric Matters Ltd, Hamilton, New Zealand.
  • Zulkhairi Abidin Z; Department of Statistics, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
  • Dougherty RL; Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.
  • Rowe P; Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Kansas, Lawrence, United States of America.
  • Mahaliyana AS; Fisher and Paykel Healthcare, Auckland, New Zealand.
  • Gibbs A; School of Physical and Chemical Sciences, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.
  • Roberts SA; School of Physical and Chemical Sciences, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.
PLoS One ; 16(2): e0246123, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1082172
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Nasal High Flow (NHF) therapy delivers flows of heated humidified gases up to 60 LPM (litres per minute) via a nasal cannula. Particles of oral/nasal fluid released by patients undergoing NHF therapy may pose a cross-infection risk, which is a potential concern for treating COVID-19 patients.

METHODS:

Liquid particles within the exhaled breath of healthy participants were measured with two protocols (1) high speed camera imaging and counting exhaled particles under high magnification (6 participants) and (2) measuring the deposition of a chemical marker (riboflavin-5-monophosphate) at a distance of 100 and 500 mm on filter papers through which air was drawn (10 participants). The filter papers were assayed with HPLC. Breathing conditions tested included quiet (resting) breathing and vigorous breathing (which here means nasal snorting, voluntary coughing and voluntary sneezing). Unsupported (natural) breathing and NHF at 30 and 60 LPM were compared.

RESULTS:

Imaging During quiet breathing, no particles were recorded with unsupported breathing or 30 LPM NHF (detection limit for single particles 33 µm). Particles were detected from 2 of 6 participants at 60 LPM quiet breathing at approximately 10% of the rate caused by unsupported vigorous breathing. Unsupported vigorous breathing released the greatest numbers of particles. Vigorous breathing with NHF at 60 LPM, released half the number of particles compared to vigorous breathing without NHF.Chemical marker tests No oral/nasal fluid was detected in quiet breathing without NHF (detection limit 0.28 µL/m3). In quiet breathing with NHF at 60 LPM, small quantities were detected in 4 out of 29 quiet breathing tests, not exceeding 17 µL/m3. Vigorous breathing released 200-1000 times more fluid than the quiet breathing with NHF. The quantities detected in vigorous breathing were similar whether using NHF or not.

CONCLUSION:

During quiet breathing, 60 LPM NHF therapy may cause oral/nasal fluid to be released as particles, at levels of tens of µL per cubic metre of air. Vigorous breathing (snort, cough or sneeze) releases 200 to 1000 times more oral/nasal fluid than quiet breathing (p < 0.001 with both imaging and chemical marker methods). During vigorous breathing, 60 LPM NHF therapy caused no statistically significant difference in the quantity of oral/nasal fluid released compared to unsupported breathing. NHF use does not increase the risk of dispersing infectious aerosols above the risk of unsupported vigorous breathing. Standard infection prevention and control measures should apply when dealing with a patient who has an acute respiratory infection, independent of which, if any, respiratory support is being used. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION ACTRN12614000924651.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: Disponible Colección: Bases de datos internacionales Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Terapia por Inhalación de Oxígeno / Espiración Tipo de estudio: Estudio pronóstico / Ensayo controlado aleatorizado Límite: Adulto / Femenino / Humanos / Masculino Idioma: Inglés Revista: PLoS One Asunto de la revista: Ciencia / Medicina Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Artículo País de afiliación: Journal.pone.0246123

Similares

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Texto completo: Disponible Colección: Bases de datos internacionales Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Terapia por Inhalación de Oxígeno / Espiración Tipo de estudio: Estudio pronóstico / Ensayo controlado aleatorizado Límite: Adulto / Femenino / Humanos / Masculino Idioma: Inglés Revista: PLoS One Asunto de la revista: Ciencia / Medicina Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Artículo País de afiliación: Journal.pone.0246123