Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Estimation of novel coronavirus (COVID-19) reproduction number and case fatality rate: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Ahammed, Tanvir; Anjum, Aniqua; Rahman, Mohammad Meshbahur; Haider, Najmul; Kock, Richard; Uddin, Md Jamal.
  • Ahammed T; Department of Statistics Shahjalal University of Science and Technology Sylhet Bangladesh.
  • Anjum A; Department of Statistics Shahjalal University of Science and Technology Sylhet Bangladesh.
  • Rahman MM; Department of Health Statistics (Meta-analysis & Geriatric Health) Biomedical Research Foundation Dhaka Bangladesh.
  • Haider N; The Royal Veterinary College University of London Hertfordshire United Kingdom.
  • Kock R; The Royal Veterinary College University of London Hertfordshire United Kingdom.
  • Uddin MJ; Department of Statistics Shahjalal University of Science and Technology Sylhet Bangladesh.
Health Sci Rep ; 4(2): e274, 2021 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1222623
Preprint
Este artículo de revista científica es probablemente basado en un preprint previamente disponible, por medio del reconocimiento de similitud realizado por una máquina. La confirmación humana aún está pendiente.
Ver preprint
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND

AIMS:

Realizing the transmission potential and the magnitude of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) aids public health monitoring, strategies, and preparation. Two fundamental parameters, the basic reproduction number (R 0) and case fatality rate (CFR) of COVID-19, help in this understanding process. The objective of this study was to estimate the R 0 and CFR of COVID-19 and assess whether the parameters vary in different regions of the world.

METHODS:

We carried out a systematic review to find the reported estimates of the R 0 and the CFR in articles from international databases between January 1 and August 31, 2020. Random-effect models and Forest plots were implemented to evaluate the mean effect size of R 0 and the CFR. Furthermore, R 0 and CFR of the studies were quantified based on geographic location, the tests/thousand population, and the median population age of the countries where the studies were conducted. To assess statistical heterogeneity among the selected articles, the I 2 statistic and the Cochran's Q test were used.

RESULTS:

Forty-five studies involving R 0 and 34 studies involving CFR were included. The pooled estimation of R 0 was 2.69 (95% CI 2.40, 2.98), and that of the CFR was 2.67 (2.25, 3.13). The CFR in different regions of the world varied significantly, from 2.49 (2.08, 2.94) in Asia to 3.40 (2.81, 4.04) in North America. We observed higher mean CFR values for the countries with lower tests (3.15 vs 2.16) and greater median population age (3.13 vs 2.27). However, R 0 did not vary significantly in different regions of the world.

CONCLUSIONS:

An R 0 of 2.69 and a CFR of 2.67 indicate the severity of the COVID-19. Although R 0 and CFR may vary over time, space, and demographics, we recommend considering these figures in control and prevention measures.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: Disponible Colección: Bases de datos internacionales Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Estudio experimental / Estudio observacional / Estudio pronóstico / Ensayo controlado aleatorizado / Revisiones / Revisión sistemática/Meta análisis Idioma: Inglés Revista: Health Sci Rep Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Artículo

Similares

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Texto completo: Disponible Colección: Bases de datos internacionales Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Estudio experimental / Estudio observacional / Estudio pronóstico / Ensayo controlado aleatorizado / Revisiones / Revisión sistemática/Meta análisis Idioma: Inglés Revista: Health Sci Rep Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Artículo