Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Update I. A systematic review on the efficacy and safety of chloroquine/hydroxychloroquine for COVID-19.
Cortegiani, Andrea; Ippolito, Mariachiara; Ingoglia, Giulia; Iozzo, Pasquale; Giarratano, Antonino; Einav, Sharon.
  • Cortegiani A; Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Science (Di.Chir.On.S.), Section of Anaesthesia, Analgesia, Intensive Care and Emergency, Policlinico Paolo Giaccone, University of Palermo, Italy. Electronic address: andrea.cortegiani@unipa.it.
  • Ippolito M; Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Science (Di.Chir.On.S.), Section of Anaesthesia, Analgesia, Intensive Care and Emergency, Policlinico Paolo Giaccone, University of Palermo, Italy.
  • Ingoglia G; Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Science (Di.Chir.On.S.), Section of Anaesthesia, Analgesia, Intensive Care and Emergency, Policlinico Paolo Giaccone, University of Palermo, Italy.
  • Iozzo P; Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Policlinico Paolo Giaccone, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
  • Giarratano A; Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Science (Di.Chir.On.S.), Section of Anaesthesia, Analgesia, Intensive Care and Emergency, Policlinico Paolo Giaccone, University of Palermo, Italy.
  • Einav S; Intensive Care Unit of the Shaare Zedek Medical Medical Centre and Hebrew University Faculty of Medicine, Jerusalem, Israel.
J Crit Care ; 59: 176-190, 2020 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-640509
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To assess efficacy and safety of chloroquine (CQ)/hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) for treatment or prophylaxis of COVID-19 in adult humans. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

MEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASE and two pre-print repositories (bioRxiv, medRxiv) were searched from inception to 8th June 2020 for RCTs and nonrandomized studies (retrospective and prospective, including single-arm, studies) addressing the use of CQ/HCQ in any dose or combination for COVID-19.

RESULTS:

Thirty-two studies were included (6 RCTs, 26 nonrandomized, 29,192 participants). Two RCTs had high risk, two 'some concerns' and two low risk of bias (Rob2). Among nonrandomized studies with comparators, nine had high risk and five moderate risk of bias (ROBINS-I). Data synthesis was not possible. Low and moderate risk of bias studies suggest that treatment of hospitalized COVID-19 with CQ/HCQ may not reduce risk of death, compared to standard care. High dose regimens or combination with macrolides may be associated with harm. Postexposure prophylaxis may not reduce the rate of infection but the quality of the evidence is low.

CONCLUSIONS:

Patients with COVID-19 should be treated with CQ/HCQ only if monitored and within the context of high quality RCTs. High quality data about efficacy/safety are urgently needed.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: Disponible Colección: Bases de datos internacionales Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Antivirales / Neumonía Viral / Cloroquina / Infecciones por Coronavirus / Hidroxicloroquina Tipo de estudio: Estudio de cohorte / Estudio observacional / Estudio pronóstico / Revisiones / Revisión sistemática/Meta análisis Límite: Humanos Idioma: Inglés Revista: J Crit Care Asunto de la revista: Terapia intensiva Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Artículo

Similares

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Texto completo: Disponible Colección: Bases de datos internacionales Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Antivirales / Neumonía Viral / Cloroquina / Infecciones por Coronavirus / Hidroxicloroquina Tipo de estudio: Estudio de cohorte / Estudio observacional / Estudio pronóstico / Revisiones / Revisión sistemática/Meta análisis Límite: Humanos Idioma: Inglés Revista: J Crit Care Asunto de la revista: Terapia intensiva Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Artículo