Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Evolving global and national criteria for identifying a suspected case of COVID-19.
Atsawarungruangkit, Amporn; Yuan, Jin; Kodama, Takamitsu; Cheng, Ming-Tai; Mansouri, Mohammad; Han, Boram; Kongkamnerd, Jarinrat; Riegg, Fabian; Menon, Anupama; Moss, Steven F.
  • Atsawarungruangkit A; Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, United States.
  • Yuan J; Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.
  • Kodama T; Tajimi City Hospital, Gifu, Japan.
  • Cheng MT; National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
  • Mansouri M; Montefiore Medical Center, New York, New York, United States.
  • Han B; East Boston Neighborhood Health Center, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.
  • Kongkamnerd J; Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.
  • Riegg F; Farmacia, Chiangmai, Thailand.
  • Menon A; Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, United States.
  • Moss SF; University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
J Int Med Res ; 48(8): 300060520938943, 2020 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-737613
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) began in December 2019 and continues to spread worldwide. Rapid and accurate identification of suspected cases is critical in slowing spread of the virus that causes the disease. We aimed to highlight discrepancies in the various criteria used by international agencies and highly impacted individual countries around the world.

METHODS:

We reviewed the criteria for identifying a suspected case of COVID-19 used by two international public health agencies and 10 countries across Asia, Europe, and North America. The criteria included information on the clinical causes of illness and epidemiological risk factors. Non-English language guidelines were translated into English by a co-author who is fluent in that particular language.

RESULTS:

Although most criteria are modifications of World Health Organization recommendations, the specific clinical features and epidemiological risks for triggering evaluation of patients with suspected COVID-19 differed widely among countries. The rationale for these differences may be related to each country's resources, politics, experience with previous outbreaks or pandemics, health insurance system, COVID-19 outbreak severity, and other undetermined factors.

CONCLUSION:

We found no consensus regarding the best diagnostic criteria for identifying a suspected case of COVID-19.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: Disponible Colección: Bases de datos internacionales Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neumonía Viral / Salud Pública / Infecciones por Coronavirus / Reglamento Sanitario Internacional Tipo de estudio: Estudios diagnósticos / Estudio experimental / Estudio observacional / Estudio pronóstico Límite: Humanos País/Región como asunto: America del Norte / Asia / Europa Idioma: Inglés Revista: J Int Med Res Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Artículo País de afiliación: 0300060520938943

Similares

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Texto completo: Disponible Colección: Bases de datos internacionales Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neumonía Viral / Salud Pública / Infecciones por Coronavirus / Reglamento Sanitario Internacional Tipo de estudio: Estudios diagnósticos / Estudio experimental / Estudio observacional / Estudio pronóstico Límite: Humanos País/Región como asunto: America del Norte / Asia / Europa Idioma: Inglés Revista: J Int Med Res Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Artículo País de afiliación: 0300060520938943