Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Efficacy and safety of Lianhua Qingwen in the treatment of patients with moderate COVID-19 infection: A protocol for systematic review and meta analysis.
Liu, Nanyang; Zhang, Tingting; Ma, Lina; Wang, Huican; Cao, Yu; Yang, Yang; Pei, Hui; Li, Hao.
  • Liu N; Xiyuan Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing.
  • Zhang T; College of First Clinical Medicine, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, Shandong Province, P.R. China.
  • Ma L; Xiyuan Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing.
  • Wang H; Xiyuan Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing.
  • Cao Y; Xiyuan Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing.
  • Yang Y; Xiyuan Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing.
  • Pei H; Xiyuan Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing.
  • Li H; Xiyuan Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 99(33): e21614, 2020 Aug 14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-740196
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

As of June 2020, more than 7 million cases of coronavirus disease (COVID-2019) have been reported worldwide. At present, there is no vaccine or antiviral for the novel coronavirus pneumonia. Lianhua Qingwen (LQ), a Chinese medicine formula, has been authorized by the Chinese government for treating COVID-2019. This systematic review and meta-analysis will evaluate the efficacy and safety of LQ on patients with COVID-19.

METHODS:

Two independent reviewers will search the following databases of the China Biology Medicine disc, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, China Science and Technology Periodical Database, Wanfang database, Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane Library from the date of conception to June 1, 2020. We will use the MeSH/Emtree terms, combining free-text words that were properly adjusted for the different databases in all of the search strategies. We will take primary clinical symptoms, total efficacy, and adverse event into consideration for our primary outcomes. As secondary outcomes, we will estimate the chest computed tomography manifestations, the rate of conversion to severe cases, and secondary clinical symptoms. We will evaluate the quality of including studies through the risk of bias assessment tool provided by the Cochrane Collaboration. Fixed-or random-effect model will be utilized to calculate the overall pooled risk estimates. Forest plots will be generated to prove the pooled results. Sensitivity analysis will be carried out to identify sources of heterogeneity. The Begg rank correlation test and Egger linear regression test will be used to explore publication bias.

RESULTS:

This systematic review and meta-analysis will compare the primary and secondary outcomes at baseline and endpoint in the treatment and control groups to investigate the efficacy and safety of LQ for treatment COVID-2019.

DISCUSSION:

Data from this study will provide strong evidence for clinical decision if the findings are positive.PROSPERO registration number CRD42020190757.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: Disponible Colección: Bases de datos internacionales Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Antivirales / Neumonía Viral / Medicamentos Herbarios Chinos / Infecciones por Coronavirus / Betacoronavirus Tipo de estudio: Estudio experimental / Estudio observacional / Estudio pronóstico / Ensayo controlado aleatorizado / Revisiones / Revisión sistemática/Meta análisis Tópicos: Medicina tradicional / Vacunas Límite: Femenino / Humanos / Masculino Idioma: Inglés Revista: Medicine (Baltimore) Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Artículo

Similares

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Texto completo: Disponible Colección: Bases de datos internacionales Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Antivirales / Neumonía Viral / Medicamentos Herbarios Chinos / Infecciones por Coronavirus / Betacoronavirus Tipo de estudio: Estudio experimental / Estudio observacional / Estudio pronóstico / Ensayo controlado aleatorizado / Revisiones / Revisión sistemática/Meta análisis Tópicos: Medicina tradicional / Vacunas Límite: Femenino / Humanos / Masculino Idioma: Inglés Revista: Medicine (Baltimore) Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Artículo