Your browser doesn't support javascript.
ROX index as a good predictor of high flow nasal cannula failure in COVID-19 patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Prakash, Jay; Bhattacharya, Pradip Kumar; Yadav, Arun Kumar; Kumar, Amit; Tudu, Lal Chand; Prasad, Kameshwar.
  • Prakash J; Department of Critical Care Medicine, Rajendra Institute of Medical Sciences, Ranchi, Jharkhand, India. Electronic address: dr.jay_prakash@rediffmail.com.
  • Bhattacharya PK; Department of Critical Care Medicine, Rajendra Institute of Medical Sciences, Ranchi, Jharkhand, India.
  • Yadav AK; Department of Community Medicine, Armed Forces Medical College, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
  • Kumar A; Department of Neurology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
  • Tudu LC; Department of Critical Care Medicine, Rajendra Institute of Medical Sciences, Ranchi, Jharkhand, India.
  • Prasad K; Professor of Neurology and Director, Rajendra Institute of Medical Sciences, Ranchi, Jharkhand, India.
J Crit Care ; 66: 102-108, 2021 12.
Article Dans Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1401595
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

Prediction of high flow nasal cannula (HFNC) failure in COVID-19 patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF) may improve clinical management and stratification of patients for optimal treatment. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine performance of ROX index as a predictor of HFNC failure. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

Systematic search was performed in electronic databases (PubMed, Google Scholar, Web of Science and Cochrane Library) for articles published till 15 June 2021 investigating ROX index as a predictor for HFNC failure. Quality In Prognosis Studies (QUIPS) tool was used to analyze risk of bias for prognostic factors, by two independent authors.

RESULTS:

Eight retrospective or prospective cohort studies involving 1301 patients showed a good discriminatory value, summary area under the curve (sAUC) 0.81 (95% CI, 0.77-0.84) with sensitivity of 0.70 (95% CI, 0.59-0.80) and specificity of 0.79 (95% CI, 0.67-0.88) for predicting HNFC failure. The positive and negative likelihood ratio were 3.0 (95% CI, 2.2-5.3) and 0.37 (95% CI, 0.28-0.50) respectively, and was strongly associated with a promising predictive accuracy (Diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) 9, 95% CI, 5-16).

CONCLUSION:

This meta-analysis suggests ROX index has good discriminating power for prediction of HFNC failure in COVID-19 patients with AHRF.
Sujets)
Mots clés

Texte intégral: Disponible Collection: Bases de données internationales Base de données: MEDLINE Sujet Principal: Insuffisance respiratoire / Ventilation non effractive / COVID-19 Type d'étude: Étude de cohorte / Étude observationnelle / Étude pronostique / Révision / Examen systématique/Méta-analyse Limites du sujet: Humains langue: Anglais Revue: J Crit Care Thème du journal: Soin critique Année: 2021 Type de document: Article

Documents relatifs à ce sujet

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Texte intégral: Disponible Collection: Bases de données internationales Base de données: MEDLINE Sujet Principal: Insuffisance respiratoire / Ventilation non effractive / COVID-19 Type d'étude: Étude de cohorte / Étude observationnelle / Étude pronostique / Révision / Examen systématique/Méta-analyse Limites du sujet: Humains langue: Anglais Revue: J Crit Care Thème du journal: Soin critique Année: 2021 Type de document: Article