Detalles de la búsqueda
1.
What can We Learn From High-Performing Screening Programs to Increase Bowel Cancer Screening Participation in Australia?
Cancer Control
; 29: 10732748221121383, 2022.
Artículo
en Inglés
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35969473
2.
Decision-making in screening positive participants who follow up with colonoscopy in the Dutch colorectal cancer screening programme: A mixed-method study.
Psychooncology
; 31(2): 245-252, 2022 02.
Artículo
en Inglés
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34535928
3.
Reasons for No Colonoscopy After an Unfavorable Screening Result in Dutch Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Nationwide Questionnaire.
Ann Fam Med
; 20(6): 526-534, 2022.
Artículo
en Inglés
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36443069
4.
Motives for non-adherence to colonoscopy advice after a positive colorectal cancer screening test result: a qualitative study.
Scand J Prim Health Care
; 38(4): 487-498, 2020 Dec.
Artículo
en Inglés
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33185121
5.
The role of general practitioners in the work guidance of cancer patients: views of general practitioners and occupational physicians.
J Cancer Surviv
; 17(2): 416-424, 2023 04.
Artículo
en Inglés
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35469363
6.
GPs' perspectives on colorectal cancer screening and their potential influence on FIT-positive patients: an exploratory qualitative study from a Dutch context.
BJGP Open
; 3(1): bjgpopen18X101631, 2019 Apr.
Artículo
en Inglés
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31049411
7.
Cancer screening programs should incorporate values and preferences of potential participants.
J Clin Epidemiol
; 120: 123, 2020 04.
Artículo
en Inglés
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31863821
8.
Qualitative approaches can strengthen generalization and application of clinical research.
J Clin Epidemiol
; 119: 136-139, 2020 03.
Artículo
en Inglés
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31706960
Resultados
1 -
8
de 8
1
Próxima >
>>