Detalles de la búsqueda
1.
Effect of annualized surgeon volume on major surgical complications for abdominal and laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer in China, 2004-2016: a retrospective cohort study.
BMC Womens Health
; 23(1): 69, 2023 02 15.
Artículo
en Inglés
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36793026
2.
Comparison of survival outcomes between squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma/adenosquamous carcinoma of the cervix after radical radiotherapy and chemotherapy.
BMC Cancer
; 22(1): 326, 2022 Mar 25.
Artículo
en Inglés
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35337279
3.
Comparison of survival outcomes of abdominal radical hysterectomy and radiochemotherapy IIA2 (FIGO2018) cervical cancer: a retrospective study from a large database of 63,926 cases of cervical cancer in China.
Int J Clin Oncol
; 27(3): 619-625, 2022 Mar.
Artículo
en Inglés
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34837596
4.
Comparison between laparoscopic and abdominal radical hysterectomy for low-risk cervical cancer: a multicentre retrospective study.
Arch Gynecol Obstet
; 305(2): 449-458, 2022 02.
Artículo
en Inglés
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34406459
5.
Comparison of survival outcomes with or without Para-aortic lymphadenectomy in surgical patients with stage IB1-IIA2 cervical cancer in China from 2004 to 2016.
BMC Cancer
; 21(1): 1091, 2021 Oct 09.
Artículo
en Inglés
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34627169
6.
Comparison of survival outcomes between laparoscopic surgery and abdominal surgery for radical hysterectomy as primary treatment in patients with stage IB2/IIA2 cervical cancer.
J Obstet Gynaecol Res
; 47(4): 1516-1526, 2021 Apr.
Artículo
en Inglés
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33527615
7.
Comparison of survival outcomes between radio-chemotherapy and radical hysterectomy with postoperative standard therapy in patients with stage IB1 to IIA2 cervical cancer: long-term oncological outcome analysis in 37 Chinese hospitals.
BMC Cancer
; 20(1): 189, 2020 Mar 06.
Artículo
en Inglés
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32138718
8.
Effect of laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy on major surgical complications in women with stage IA-IIB cervical cancer in China, 2004-2015.
Gynecol Oncol
; 156(1): 115-123, 2020 01.
Artículo
en Inglés
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31806399
9.
Comparison between robot-assisted radical hysterectomy and abdominal radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: A multicentre retrospective study.
Gynecol Oncol
; 157(2): 429-436, 2020 05.
Artículo
en Inglés
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32067814
10.
Risk factors and long-term impact of urologic complications during radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer in China, 2004-2016.
Gynecol Oncol
; 158(2): 294-302, 2020 08.
Artículo
en Inglés
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32507516
11.
Comparison of laparoscopic and abdominal radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer: oncologic outcomes based on tumor diameter.
Int J Gynecol Cancer
; 30(9): 1308-1316, 2020 09.
Artículo
en Inglés
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32699022
12.
Laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy for stage IB1 cervical cancer patients with tumor size ≤ 2 cm: a case-matched control study.
Int J Clin Oncol
; 25(5): 937-947, 2020 May.
Artículo
en Inglés
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32062731
13.
Sipa1 promoter polymorphism predicts risk and metastasis of lung cancer in Chinese.
Mol Carcinog
; 52 Suppl 1: E110-7, 2013 Nov.
Artículo
en Inglés
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23661532
14.
The long-term outcomes of clinical responders to neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical surgery in locally advanced cervical cancer.
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol
; 149(8): 4867-4876, 2023 Jul.
Artículo
en Inglés
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36269389
15.
Which factors predict parametrial involvement in stage IB cervical cancer? A Chinese multicentre study.
Eur J Surg Oncol
; 49(9): 106936, 2023 09.
Artículo
en Inglés
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37244844
16.
Discussion on the Treatment Strategy for Stage â ¡A1 Cervical Cancer (FIGO 2018).
Front Oncol
; 12: 800049, 2022.
Artículo
en Inglés
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35494051
17.
Comparison of the Oncological Outcomes Between Robot-Assisted and Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer Based on the New FIGO 2018 Staging System: A Multicentre Retrospective Study.
Front Oncol
; 12: 879569, 2022.
Artículo
en Inglés
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35847917
18.
Discussion on the rationality of FIGO 2018 stage IIIC for cervical cancer with oncological outcomes: a cohort study.
Ann Transl Med
; 10(2): 122, 2022 Jan.
Artículo
en Inglés
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35282078
19.
Development and validation of a prognostic nomogram for 2018 FIGO stages IB1, IB2, and IIA1 cervical cancer: a large multicenter study.
Ann Transl Med
; 10(2): 121, 2022 Jan.
Artículo
en Inglés
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35282114
20.
A non-synonymous polymorphism Thr115Met in the EpCAM gene is associated with an increased risk of breast cancer in Chinese population.
Breast Cancer Res Treat
; 126(2): 487-95, 2011 Apr.
Artículo
en Inglés
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20683652