Detalles de la búsqueda
1.
Understanding physician-level barriers to the use of individualized risk estimates in percutaneous coronary intervention.
Am Heart J
; 178: 190-7, 2016 08.
Artículo
en Inglés
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27502869
2.
Improving the process of informed consent for percutaneous coronary intervention: patient outcomes from the Patient Risk Information Services Manager (ePRISM) study.
Am Heart J
; 169(2): 234-241.e1, 2015 Feb.
Artículo
en Inglés
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25641532
3.
Developing and Testing a Personalized, Evidence-Based, Shared Decision-Making Tool for Stent Selection in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Using a Pre-Post Study Design.
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes
; 12(2): e005139, 2019 02.
Artículo
en Inglés
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30764654
4.
Precision medicine to improve use of bleeding avoidance strategies and reduce bleeding in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: prospective cohort study before and after implementation of personalized bleeding risks.
BMJ
; 350: h1302, 2015 Mar 24.
Artículo
en Inglés
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25805158
5.
Patient-Centered Decision Support in Acute Ischemic Stroke: Qualitative Study of Patients' and Providers' Perspectives.
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes
; 8(6 Suppl 3): S109-16, 2015 Oct.
Artículo
en Inglés
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26515198
6.
Pre-procedural estimate of individualized bleeding risk impacts physicians' utilization of bivalirudin during percutaneous coronary intervention.
J Am Coll Cardiol
; 61(18): 1847-52, 2013 May 07.
Artículo
en Inglés
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23500304
7.
Concordance of physician ratings with the appropriate use criteria for coronary revascularization.
J Am Coll Cardiol
; 57(14): 1546-53, 2011 Apr 05.
Artículo
en Inglés
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21453833
8.
Implementing an innovative consent form: the PREDICT experience.
Implement Sci
; 3: 58, 2008 Dec 31.
Artículo
en Inglés
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19117513
Resultados
1 -
8
de 8
1
Próxima >
>>