Detalles de la búsqueda
1.
Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for grade I lumbar spondylolisthesis: 5-year follow-up from the prospective multicenter Quality Outcomes Database registry.
Neurosurg Focus
; 54(1): E2, 2023 01.
Artículo
en Inglés
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36587409
2.
Developing nonlinear k-nearest neighbors classification algorithms to identify patients at high risk of increased length of hospital stay following spine surgery.
Neurosurg Focus
; 54(6): E7, 2023 06.
Artículo
en Inglés
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37283368
3.
Three-level ACDF versus 3-level laminectomy and fusion: are there differences in outcomes? An analysis of the Quality Outcomes Database cervical spondylotic myelopathy cohort.
Neurosurg Focus
; 55(3): E2, 2023 Sep.
Artículo
en Inglés
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37657103
4.
Which supervised machine learning algorithm can best predict achievement of minimum clinically important difference in neck pain after surgery in patients with cervical myelopathy? A QOD study.
Neurosurg Focus
; 54(6): E5, 2023 06.
Artículo
en Inglés
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37283449
5.
Greater improvement in Neck Disability Index scores in women after surgery for cervical myelopathy: an analysis of the Quality Outcomes Database.
Neurosurg Focus
; 55(5): E7, 2023 11.
Artículo
en Inglés
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37913530
6.
Quality Outcomes Database Spine Care Project 2012-2020: milestones achieved in a collaborative North American outcomes registry to advance value-based spine care and evolution to the American Spine Registry.
Neurosurg Focus
; 48(5): E2, 2020 05 01.
Artículo
en Inglés
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32357320
7.
Correlation of return to work with patient satisfaction after surgery for lumbar spondylolisthesis: an analysis of the Quality Outcomes Database.
Neurosurg Focus
; 48(5): E5, 2020 05 01.
Artículo
en Inglés
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32357321
8.
Predictive model for long-term patient satisfaction after surgery for grade I degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: insights from the Quality Outcomes Database.
Neurosurg Focus
; 46(5): E12, 2019 05 01.
Artículo
en Inglés
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31042653
9.
A comparison of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and decompression alone for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.
Neurosurg Focus
; 46(5): E13, 2019 05 01.
Artículo
en Inglés
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31042655
10.
A predictive model and nomogram for predicting return to work at 3 months after cervical spine surgery: an analysis from the Quality Outcomes Database.
Neurosurg Focus
; 45(5): E9, 2018 11 01.
Artículo
en Inglés
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30453462
11.
Women fare best following surgery for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: a comparison of the most and least satisfied patients utilizing data from the Quality Outcomes Database.
Neurosurg Focus
; 44(1): E3, 2018 01.
Artículo
en Inglés
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29290130
12.
Defining the minimum clinically important difference for grade I degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: insights from the Quality Outcomes Database.
Neurosurg Focus
; 44(1): E2, 2018 01.
Artículo
en Inglés
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29290132
13.
Minimally invasive versus open fusion for Grade I degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: analysis of the Quality Outcomes Database.
Neurosurg Focus
; 43(2): E11, 2017 Aug.
Artículo
en Inglés
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28760035
14.
Introduction. Evolution of the Science of Practice.
Neurosurg Focus
; 48(5): E1, 2020 05 01.
Artículo
en Inglés
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32357318
15.
Improving discharge data fidelity for use in large administrative databases.
Neurosurg Focus
; 36(6): E2, 2014 Jun.
Artículo
en Inglés
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24881634
16.
Impact of educational background on preoperative disease severity and postoperative outcomes among patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis: a Quality Outcomes Database study.
J Neurosurg Spine
; : 1-12, 2024 May 31.
Artículo
en Inglés
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38820603
17.
Is Upper Extremity or Lower Extremity Function More Important for Patient Satisfaction? An Analysis of 24-Month Outcomes from the QOD Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy Cohort.
Clin Spine Surg
; 37(4): 188-197, 2024 May 01.
Artículo
en Inglés
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38706113
18.
What factors influence surgical decision-making in anterior versus posterior surgery for cervical myelopathy? A QOD analysis.
J Neurosurg Spine
; 40(2): 206-215, 2024 Feb 01.
Artículo
en Inglés
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37948703
19.
Does diabetes affect outcome or reoperation rate after lumbar decompression or arthrodesis? A matched analysis of the Quality Outcomes Database data set.
J Neurosurg Spine
; 40(3): 331-342, 2024 Mar 01.
Artículo
en Inglés
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38039534
20.
Cervical spondylotic myelopathy and driving abilities: defining the prevalence and long-term postoperative outcomes using the Quality Outcomes Database.
J Neurosurg Spine
; 40(5): 630-641, 2024 May 01.
Artículo
en Inglés
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38364219