Detalles de la búsqueda
1.
Conclusiveness, linguistic characteristics and readability of Cochrane plain language summaries of intervention reviews: a cross-sectional study.
BMC Med Res Methodol
; 22(1): 240, 2022 09 10.
Artículo
en Inglés
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36088293
2.
Assessments of attrition bias in Cochrane systematic reviews are highly inconsistent and thus hindering trial comparability.
BMC Med Res Methodol
; 19(1): 76, 2019 04 05.
Artículo
en Inglés
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30953448
3.
Frequency of use and adequacy of Cochrane risk of bias tool 2 in non-Cochrane systematic reviews published in 2020: Meta-research study.
Res Synth Methods
; 15(3): 430-440, 2024 May.
Artículo
en Inglés
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38262609
4.
Linguistic analysis of plain language summaries and corresponding scientific summaries of Cochrane systematic reviews about oncology interventions.
Cancer Med
; 12(9): 10950-10960, 2023 05.
Artículo
en Inglés
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36951519
5.
Non-CpG sites preference in G:C > A:T transition of TP53 in gastric cancer of Eastern Europe (Poland, Romania and Hungary) compared to East Asian countries (China and Japan).
Genes Environ
; 45(1): 1, 2023 Jan 04.
Artículo
en Inglés
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36600315
Resultados
1 -
5
de 5
1
Próxima >
>>