Compreendendo o GRADE: PICO e qualidade dos estudos

Roever, Leonardo; Gomes-Neto, Mansueto; Durães, André Rodrigues; Reis, Paulo Eduardo Ocke; Pollo-Flores, Priscila; Silva, Rose Mary Lisboa da; Resende, Elmiro Santos.
Rev. Soc. Bras. Clín. Méd ; 19(1): 54-61, março 2021. tab.
Artículo en Portugués | LILACS | ID: biblio-1361752

Documentos relacionados

  1. GRADE guidelines: 21 part 1. Study design, risk of bias, and indirectness in rating the certainty across a body of evidence for test accuracy.
  2. GRADE guidelines: 21 part 2. Test accuracy: inconsistency, imprecision, publication bias, and other domains for rating the certainty of evidence and presenting it in evidence profiles and summary of findings tables.
  3. GRADE guidelines 33: Addressing imprecision in a network meta-analysis.
  4. GRADE Guidance: 31. Assessing the certainty across a body of evidence for comparative test accuracy.
  5. Clustering single-cell multi-omics data with MoClust.
  6. Mdwgan-gp: data augmentation for gene expression data based on multiple discriminator WGAN-GP.
  7. Q-raKtion: A Semiautomated KNIME Workflow for Bioactivity Data Points Curation.
  8. Development of an Innovative Tool to Appraise Big Data for Best Evidence.
  9. Evaluating the data quality of continuous emissions monitoring systems in China.
  10. Making inference with messy (citizen science) data: when are data accurate enough and how can they be improved?