Evaluación costo-efectividad de las prótesis con superficie cerámica-polietileno vs. metal-polietileno para reemplazo articular primario de cadera en Colombia

Suárez, Cristina; Forero, Alejandra; Monsalvo, Daniel; Taborda, Alejandra; Londoño, Dario.
Rev. colomb. ortop. traumatol ; 34(3): 223-230, 2020. ilus.
Artículo en Español | LILACS, COLNAL | ID: biblio-1378151

Documentos relacionados

  1. [Bearing surfaces in primary hip arthroplasty. Is there any difference?]
  2. Pares articulares en prótesis primaria de cadera. ¿Existe alguna diferencia?
  3. Comparisons of Different Bearing Surfaces in Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Bayesian Network Analysis.
  4. Total Hip Arthroplasty: National Bearing Surface Trends for 20- to 50-Year-Old Patients.
  5. Ceramic Femoral Heads Exhibit Lower Wear Rates Compared to Cobalt Chrome: A Meta-Analysis.
  6. Performance of thin Vivacit-E hip liners: no relevant wear during ex vivo testing at high acetabular inclination angle.
  7. Early failure for wear after ceramic-on-highly cross-linked polyethylene total hip arthroplasty: a case report.
  8. Mean 16-Year Results of Total Hip Arthroplasty With Alumina Ceramic Femoral Heads on Highly Cross-Linked Polyethylene in Patients 50 Years or Less.
  9. Ceramic Wear Particles: Can They Be Retrieved In Vivo and Duplicated In Vitro?
  10. Femoral Head Penetration Rates of Second-Generation Sequentially Annealed Highly Cross-Linked Polyethylene at Minimum Five Years.