Randomized controlled trial comparing nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation and nasal continuous positive airway pressure in premature infants after tracheal extubation

Komatsu, Daniela Franco Rizzo; Diniz, Edna Maria de Albuquerque; Ferraro, Alexandre Archanjo; Ceccon, Maria Esther Jurvest Rivero; Vaz, Flávio Adolfo Costa.
Rev. Assoc. Med. Bras. (1992) ; 62(6): 568-574, Sept. 2016. tab, graf
Artículo en Inglés | LILACS | ID: biblio-829507

Documentos relacionados

  1. Postextubation Noninvasive Ventilation in Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
  2. Randomized controlled trial comparing nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation and nasal continuous positive airway pressure in premature infants after tracheal extubation.
  3. [Efficacy of noninvasive high-frequency oscillatory ventilation versus nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation as post-extubation respiratory support in preterm infants: a Meta analysis].
  4. [Apllication of nasal synchronous intermittent mandatory ventilation in premature infants with severe respiratory distress syndrome after extubation].
  5. Nasal HFOV versus nasal IPPV as a post-extubation respiratory support in preterm infants-a randomised controlled trial.
  6. Interventions for the management of transient tachypnoea of the newborn - an overview of systematic reviews.
  7. Noninvasive respiratory support following extubation in preterm infants.
  8. Comparison of High CPAP versus NIPPV in Preterm Neonates: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
  9. Non-invasive ventilatory support in neonates: An evidence-based update.
  10. Nasal high-frequency oscillatory ventilation versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure as primary respiratory support strategies for respiratory distress syndrome in preterm infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis.