¿Retinopexia neumática o implante de silicona para pacientes con desprendimiento regmatógeno de retina?

Martínez-Mujica, MT; Retamal, J; González, R.
Medwave ; 18(6): e7277, 2018.
Artículo en Inglés, Español | LILACS | ID: biblio-948463

Documentos relacionados

  1. Scleral buckle versus pneumatic retinopexy for rhegmatogenous retinal detachments.
  2. Primary Retinal Detachment Outcomes Study: summary of reports number 1 to number 18.
  3. Pars plana vitrectomy plus scleral buckle versus pars plana vitrec-tomy in pseudophakic retinal detachment.
  4. EVALUATION OF RETINAL DISPLACEMENT FOLLOWING PRIMARY SCLERAL BUCKLING FOR MACULA-INVOLVING RHEGMATOGENOUS RETINAL DETACHMENT.
  5. [Episcleral circular buckling in surgical treatment of recurrent rhegmatogenous retinal detachment after vitrectomy].
  6. Pars plana vitrectomy versus scleral buckling for repairing simple rhegmatogenous retinal detachments.
  7. Postoperative Results in the Treatment of Retinal Detachment with Scleral Buckling Surgery.
  8. Nationwide Trends in Vitreoretinal Procedures within Australia.
  9. BILATERAL EYE PATCHING MAY IMPROVE CLINICAL OUTCOMES FOR ACUTE PRIMARY RHEGMATOGENOUS RETINAL DETACHMENT.
  10. Review and analysis of history and utilization of pneumatic retinopexy after pneumatic retinopexy versus vitrectomy for the management of primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment outcomes randomized trial (PIVOT).