Impacto del cambio de fármaco utilizado en la inducción del parto: misoprostol vaginal versus dinoprostona

Molinero Sampedrano, Istria; Romero Ramírez, Marino; García Cancela, Esperanza; Jovell Fernández, Esther; Vives Argilagós, Ángels.
Prog. obstet. ginecol. (Ed. impr.) ; 59(4): 205-210, jul.-ago. 2016. tab
Artículo en Español | IBECS (España) | ID: ibc-163902

Documentos relacionados

  1. What can we do to reduce the associated costs in induction of labour of intrauterine growth restriction foetuses at term? A cost-analysis study.
  2. Foley catheter vs. oral misoprostol to induce labour among hypertensive women in India: a cost-consequence analysis alongside a clinical trial.
  3. Global perspectives on elective induction of labor.
  4. MIFEPRISTON IN OBSTETRICS - WHY NOT?
  5. Cervical Ripening and Induction of Labor.
  6. Vaginal misoprostol versus vaginal dinoprostone for cervical ripening and induction of labour: An individual participant data meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.
  7. The impact of vaginal pH on induction of labour outcomes: a meta-analysis of observational studies.
  8. Mechanical methods for induction of labour.
  9. Comparison of dinoprostone, misoprostol and amniotomy in labor induction.
  10. Evaluating misoprostol and mechanical methods for induction of labour: Scientific Impact Paper No. 68 April 2022.