Reparación percutánea de dehiscencia periprotésica aórtica compleja

Unzué, Leire; García, Eulogio; Díaz Antón, Belén.
Rev. esp. cardiol. (Ed. impr.) ; 70(9): 771-771, sept. 2017. ilus
Artículo en Español | IBECS (España) | ID: ibc-166506

Documentos relacionados

  1. Assessment of the MANTA closure device in real-life transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement: A single-centre observational study.
  2. Comparison of a Pure Plug-Based Versus a Primary Suture-Based Vascular Closure Device Strategy for Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: The CHOICE-CLOSURE Randomized Clinical Trial.
  3. Evaluation of the MANTA Vascular Closure Device in Transfemoral TAVI.
  4. Totally Percutaneous Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Despite Failure to Deploy a Vascular Closure Device: A Single-Centre Case Series.
  5. Vascular complications of ProGlide versus Prostar in transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) procedures: meta-analysis.
  6. Angio-Seal Used as a Bailout for Incomplete Hemostasis After Dual Perclose ProGlide Deployment in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.
  7. Manual compression versus MANTA device for access management after impella removal on the ICU.
  8. Cierre percutáneo de importante fuga paravalvular aórtica protésica
  9. Comparison of MANTA versus Perclose Prostyle large-bore vascular closure devices during transcatheter aortic valve implantation.
  10. The utilization of single versus double Perclose devices for transfemoral aortic valve replacement access site closure: Insights from Cleveland Clinic Aortic Valve Center.