Volume and effectiveness assessment of articain 4% versus mepivacaine 2% used in third molar surgery: randomized, double-blind, split-mouth controlled clinical trial

Almeida, Paula Carolina de; Raldi, Fernando Vagner; Sato, Fàbio Ricardo; Nascimento, Rodrigo Dias; Moraes, Michelle Bianchi de.
Med. oral patol. oral cir. bucal (Internet) ; 25(6): e762-e768, nov. 2020. tab
Artículo en Inglés | IBECS (España) | ID: ibc-197184

Documentos relacionados

  1. Volume and effectiveness assessment of articain 4% versus mepivacaine 2% used in third molar surgery: randomized, double-blind, split-mouth controlled clinical trial.
  2. [Objective assessment of mental nerve local anesthesia].
  3. An Investigation into Dental Local Anaesthesia Teaching in United Kingdom Dental Schools.
  4. Survey of local anesthetic use by Ontario dentists.
  5. Cardiovascular effect of dental anesthesia with articaine (40 mg with epinefrine 0,5 mg % and 40 mg with epinefrine 1 mg%) versus mepivacaine (30 mg and 20 mg with epinefrine 1 mg%) in medically compromised cardiac patients: a cross-over, randomized, single blinded study.
  6. Comparison of the anesthetic efficacy of articaine and mepivacaine in pediatric patients: a randomized, double-blind study.
  7. Injection technique and local anesthetic agent selection.
  8. Injection pain of prilocaine plain, mepivacaine plain, articaine with epinephrine, and lidocaine with epinephrine.
  9. Mepivacaine: a closer look at its properties and current utility.
  10. Comparative study of the anaesthetic efficacy of 4% articaine versus 2% mepivacaine in mandibular third molar germectomy using different anaesthetic techniques: a split-mouth clinical trial.