Flexible ureteroscopy using a 120-w holmium laser: the low-energy/high-frequency approach

Peretti, Dario; Dalmasso, Ettore; Biancolini, Roberto; Pecoraro, Angela; Ambruosi, Carlo; Venzano, Fabio; Fiori, Cristian; Porpiglia, Francesco; Maugeri, Orazio.
Arch. esp. urol. (Ed. impr.) ; 74(3): 343-349, Abr 28, 2021. tab
Artículo en Inglés | IBECS (España) | ID: ibc-218200

Documentos relacionados

  1. Flexible ureteroscopy using a 120-w holmium laser: The low-energy/high-frequency approach.
  2. Comparison of Thulium Fiber Laser versus Holmium laser in ureteroscopic lithotripsy: a Meta-analysis and systematic review.
  3. Does Moses technology enhance the efficiency and outcomes of regular holmium laser lithotripsy? Results of a pooled analysis of comparative studies.
  4. WATTS happening? Evaluation of thermal dose during holmium laser lithotripsy in a high-fidelity anatomic model.
  5. Holmium and Thulium Fiber Laser Safety in Endourological Practice: What Does the Clinician Need to Know?
  6. Tissue thermal effect during lithotripsy and tissue ablation in endourology: a systematic review of experimental studies comparing Holmium and Thulium lasers.
  7. The predictive factors that total laser energy consumed during retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS): stone area and density.
  8. [Comparative study of the efficacy and safety of a new generation of thulium fiber lasers for ureteroscopy and lithotripsy].
  9. Comparison Between Holmium:YAG Laser with MOSES Technology vs Thulium Fiber Laser Lithotripsy in Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery for Kidney Stones in Adults: A Propensity Score-matched Analysis From the FLEXible Ureteroscopy Outcomes Registry.
  10. Dusting efficacy between the regular setting of holmium laser (Ho:YAG) versus Vapor Tunnel pulse modality for non-complex kidney stones.