Histerectomía radical laparoscópica total en el cáncer de cérvix. Factibilidad, morbilidad y supervivencia

Martín Jiménez, Ángel; Torrent Colomer, Anna; Bover Barceló, Isabel; Moreno Mira, Rodolfo; Lizarbe Iranzo, Ricardo; Barrés Echevarri, Javier.
Prog. obstet. ginecol. (Ed. impr.) ; 50(9): 521-530, sept. 2007. ilus, tab
Artículo en Es | IBECS (España) | ID: ibc-64645

Documentos relacionados

  1. Comparison of survival outcomes of abdominal radical hysterectomy and radiochemotherapy IIA2 (FIGO2018) cervical cancer: a retrospective study from a large database of 63,926 cases of cervical cancer in China.
  2. Comparison between laparoscopic and abdominal radical hysterectomy for low-risk cervical cancer: a multicentre retrospective study.
  3. Practice patterns and 90-day treatment-related morbidity in early-stage cervical cancer.
  4. A retrospective assessment of the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy in Japan during the early years following its introduction: a Japanese Gynecologic Oncology Group study (JGOG1081S).
  5. Simple versus Radical Hysterectomy in Women with Low-Risk Cervical Cancer.
  6. Retrospective Comparison of Laparoscopic versus Open Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer in a Single Tertiary Care Institution from Lithuania between 2009 and 2019.
  7. Survival outcomes of laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy in early cervical cancer with incidentally identified high-risk factors.
  8. SUCCOR morbidity: complications in minimally invasive versus open radical hysterectomy in early cervical cancer.
  9. Perioperative morbidity of different operative approaches in early cervical carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing minimally invasive versus open radical hysterectomy.
  10. [Long-term oncological outcomes of laparoscopic versus abdominal surgery in stage Ⅰa1 （LVSI<sup>+</sup>）-Ⅰb1 cervical cancer patients with different tumor size: a big database in China].