Comparative study of two modes of gastroesophageal reflux measuring: conventional esophageal pH monitoring and wireless pH monitoring

Azzam, Rimon Sobhi; Sallum, Rubens A. A.; Brandão, Jeovana Ferreira; Navarro-Rodriguez, Tomás; Nasi, Ary.
Arq. gastroenterol ; 49(2): 107-112, Apr.-June 2012. tab
Artículo en Inglés | LILACS | ID: lil-640169

Documentos relacionados

  1. Safety and Efficacy of Wireless pH Monitoring in Patients Suspected of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Systematic Review.
  2. Interference with daily activities and major adverse events during esophageal pH monitoring with bravo wireless capsule versus conventional intranasal catheter: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.
  3. Bravo catheter-free pH monitoring: normal values, concordance, optimal diagnostic thresholds, and accuracy.
  4. Clinical utility and tolerability of JSPH-1 wireless esophageal pH monitoring system.
  5. 24 Versus 48-hour bravo pH monitoring.
  6. Comparative study of two modes of gastroesophageal reflux measuring: conventional esophageal pH monitoring and wireless pH monitoring.
  7. Endoscopic pH monitoring for patients with suspected or refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease.
  8. Clinical utility of the wireless pH capsule.
  9. Wireless capsules for esophageal pH monitoring: are we placing them correctly?
  10. Radiographic demonstration of a wireless capsule pH monitor in the esophagus.