Randomized double-blinded study comparing medical treatment versus iliac vein stenting in chronic venous disease
Rossi, Fabio H; Kambara, Antonio M; Izukawa, Nilo M; Rodrigues, Thiago O; Rossi, Cybelle B; Sousa, Amanda G; Metzger, Patrick B; Thorpe, Patricia E.
J. Vasc. Surg. Venous Lymphat. Disord
; 6(2): 183-191, 2018. graf, tab
Artículo
en Inglés
| SES-SP, SESSP-IDPCPROD, SES-SP | ID: biblio-1063785
OBJECTIVE:
Iliac vein stenting has emerged as the procedure of choice in the treatment of iliac vein obstruction (IVO). However, clinical outcomes have never been studied by a randomized clinical trial. Our purpose was to compare medical and endovascular treatment results in symptomatic chronic venous disease (CVD) patients with significant IVO documented by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS).METHODS:
Patients with Clinical, Etiology, Anatomy, and Pathophysiology clinical class C3 to C6 and a visual analog scale for pain (VAS pain) score >3 were considered eligible. We randomly assigned limbs with ≥50% IVO on IVUS to undergo medical treatment alone or medical treatment plus iliac vein stenting. The patient and clinical physician were blinded. Primary outcomes included change from baseline in VAS pain score, Venous Clinical Severity Score, and 36-Item Short Form Health Survey quality of life questionnaire. Secondary outcomes included stent integrity, migration, and patency rates at 6 months.
Biblioteca responsable:
BR79.1
Ubicación: BR79.1
Documentos relacionados