Your browser doesn't support javascript.

Biblioteca Virtual en Salud

Hipertensión

Home > Búsqueda > ()
XML
Imprimir Exportar

Formato de exportación:

Exportar

Email
Adicionar mas contactos
| |

Brazilian consensus on incidental gallbladder carcinoma / Consenso brasileiro de carcinoma incidental de vesícula biliar

COIMBRA, Felipe Jose F; TORRES, Orlando Jorge M; ALIKHANOV, Ruslan; AGARWAL, Anil; PESSAUX, Patrick; FERNANDES, Eduardo de Souza M; QUIREZE-JUNIOR, Claudemiro; ARAUJO, Raphael Leonardo C; GODOY, André Luis; WAECHTER, Fabio Luis; RESENDE, Alexandre Prado de; BOFF, Marcio Fernando; COELHO, Gustavo Rego; REZENDE, Marcelo Bruno de; LINHARES, Marcelo Moura; BELOTTO, Marcos; MORAES-JUNIOR, Jose Maria A; AMARAL, Paulo Cezar G; PINTO, Rinaldo Danesi; GENZINI, Tercio; LIMA, Agnaldo Soares; RIBEIRO, Heber Salvador C; RAMOS, Eduardo José; ANGHINONI, Marciano; PEREIRA, Lucio Lucas; ENNE, Marcelo; SAMPAIO, Adriano; MONTAGNINI, André Luis; DINIZ, Alessandro; JESUS, Victor Hugo Fonseca de; SIROHI, Bhawna; SHRIKHANDE, Shailesh V; PEIXOTO, Renata D`Alpino; KALIL, Antonio Nocchi; JARUFE, Nicolas; SMITH, Martin; HERMAN, Paulo.
ABCD (São Paulo, Impr.) ; 33(1): e1496, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | LILACS | ID: biblio-1130518
ABSTRACT

Background:

Incidental gallbladder cancer is defined as a cancer discovered by histological examination after cholecystectomy. It is a potentially curable disease. However, some questions related to their management remain controversial and a defined strategy is associated with better prognosis.

Aim:

To develop the first evidence-based consensus for management of patients with incidental gallbladder cancer in Brazil.

Methods:

Sixteen questions were selected, and 36 Brazilian and International members were included to the answer them. The statements were based on current evident literature. The final report was sent to the members of the panel for agreement assessment.

Results:

Intraoperative evaluation of the specimen, use of retrieval bags and routine histopathology is recommended. Complete preoperative evaluation is necessary and the reoperation should be performed once final staging is available. Evaluation of the cystic duct margin and routine 16b1 lymph node biopsy is recommended. Chemotherapy should be considered and chemoradiation therapy if microscopically positive surgical margins. Port site should be resected exceptionally. Staging laparoscopy before reoperation is recommended, but minimally invasive radical approach only in specialized minimally invasive hepatopancreatobiliary centers. The extent of liver resection is acceptable if R0 resection is achieved. Standard lymph node dissection is required for T2 tumors and above, but common bile duct resection is not recommended routinely.

Conclusions:

It was possible to prepare safe recommendations as guidance for incidental gallbladder carcinoma, addressing the most frequent topics of everyday work of digestive and general surgeons.
Biblioteca responsable: BR1.1