Estudo comparativo entre inserção do DIU TCU 380A no pós-parto imediato vs. tardio / Comparative study between TCU 380A IUD insertion in immediate vs. late postpartum
Estudo transversal retrospectivo em que foram analisadas todas as mulheres que inseriram o DIU. Os dados coletados foram computados em planilha Excel e avaliados de forma descritiva e analítica.
Resultados:
Foram avaliados 210 prontuários, onde 182 foram incluídos. Destes, 46.2% inseriram o DIU no PP imediato e 53,8% no PP tardio; ao todo 2,7% tiveram complicações durante a inserção do método. A taxa de expulsão foi de 5,5%, sendo 10,7% no PP imediato e 1,02% no PP tardio.
Conclusão:
O PP tardio mostrou ser superior nos parâmetros avaliados. No entanto, o PP imediato não deve ser desconsiderado. O imediato possui maiores taxas de expulsão, enquanto que o tardio, apresenta taxas mais elevadas de mau posicionamento.
To analyze and compare the rates of complications, expulsion, follow-up and reinsertion of the method in the immediate and late postpartum period.
Method:
Retrospective cross-sectional study in which all womenwho had the IUD inserted were analyzed. The collected data were computed in an Excel and make spreadsheet in a descriptive and analytical way.
Results:
210 medical records were taken, of which 182 were included. Of these, 46.2% inserted the IUD in the immediate postpartum and 53.8% in the late postpartum; a total of 2.7% had complications during insertion of the method. The expulsion rate was 5.5%, being 10.7% in the immediate postpartum and 1.02% in the late postpartum.
Conclusion:
The late postpartum proved to be superior in the adopted parameters. However, the immediate postpartum should not be disregarded. The immediate period has higher expulsion rates, while the late one has higher rates of bad positioning.