The use of bedside echocardiography in the care of critically ill patients - a joint consensus document of the Associação de Medicina Intensiva Brasileira, Associação Brasileira de Medicina de Emergência and Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Hospitalar. Part 2 - Technical aspects / O uso da ecocardiografia à beira do leito no cuidado do paciente grave - um documento conjunto de consenso da Associação de Medicina Intensiva Brasileira, Associação Brasileira de Medicina de Emergência e Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Hospitalar. Parte 2 - Aspectos técnicos
Pellegrini, José Augusto Santos; Mendes, Ciro Leite; Gottardo, Paulo César; Feitosa, Khalil; John, Josiane França; Oliveira, Ana Cláudia Tonelli de; Negri, Alexandre Jorge de Andrade; Grumann, Ana Burigo; Barros, Dalton de Souza; Negri, Fátima Elizabeth Fonseca de Oliveira; Macedo, Gérson Luiz de; Neves, Júlio Leal Bandeira; Rodrigues, Márcio da Silveira; Spagnól, Marcio Fernando; Ferez, Marcus Antonio; Chalhub, Ricardo Ávila; Cordioli, Ricardo Luiz.
Crit. Care Sci
; 35(2): 117-146, 2023. tab, graf
Artículo
en Inglés
|
LILACS-Express
| ID: biblio-1448100
ABSTRACT Echocardiography in critically ill patients has become essential in the evaluation of patients in different settings, such as the hospital. However, unlike for other matters related to the care of these patients, there are still no recommendations from national medical societies on the subject. The objective of this document was to organize and make available expert consensus opinions that may help to better incorporate echocardiography in the evaluation of critically ill patients. Thus, the Associação de Medicina Intensiva Brasileira, the Associação Brasileira de Medicina de Emergência, and the Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Hospitalar formed a group of 17 physicians to formulate questions relevant to the topic and discuss the possibility of consensus for each of them. All questions were prepared using a five-point Likert scale. Consensus was defined a priori as at least 80% of the responses between one and two or between four and five. The consideration of the issues involved two rounds of voting and debate among all participants. The 27 questions prepared make up the present document and are divided into 4 major assessment areas left ventricular function, right ventricular function, diagnosis of shock, and hemodynamics. At the end of the process, there were 17 positive (agreement) and 3 negative (disagreement) consensuses; another 7 questions remained without consensus. Although areas of uncertainty persist, this document brings together consensus opinions on several issues related to echocardiography in critically ill patients and may enhance its development in the national scenario.
Biblioteca responsable:
BR1.1
Texto completo
Documentos relacionados