Preventing crime: what works, what doesn't, what's promising: a report to the United States Congress
Sherman, Lawrence W; Gottfredson, Denise; MacKenzie, Doris; Eck, John; Reuter, Peter; Bushway, Shawn.
s.l; National Institute of Justice; s.d. xi, [145] p.
Monografía
en Inglés
| CLAVES, FIOCRUZ | ID: cla-2267
Primary Conclusion. This Report found that some prevention programs work, some do not, some are promising, and some have not been tested adequately. Given the evidence of promising and effective programs, the Report finds that the effectiveness of Department of Justice funding depends heavily on whether it is directed to the urban neighborhoods where youth violence is highly concentrated. Substantial reductions in national rates of serious crime can only be achieved by prevention in areas of concentrated poverty, where the majority of all homicides in the nation occur, and where homicide rates are 20 times the national average. Primary Recommendation Because the specific methods for preventing crime in areas of concentrated poverty are not well-developed and tested, the Congress can make most effective use of DOJ local assistance funding by providing better guidance about what works. A much larger part of the national crime prevention portfolio must be invested in rigorous testing of innovative programs, in order to identify the active ingredients of locally successful programs that can be recommended for adoption in similar high-crime urban settings nation-wide. (AU)
Biblioteca responsable:
BR1782.1
Ubicación: BR1782.1; REL 364.4, P944s, [199?]
Documentos relacionados